ArticleScientific reports2025
Prognostic factors and outcomes of adjuvant and first-line metastatic treatments in melanoma a Turkish oncology group study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of melanoma has changed significantly with the discovery of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Our aim in the study is to determine which treatment alternatives, specifically dabrafenib plus trametinib and ICIs, are effective in adjuvant therapy and which treatment is effective as first-line metastatic therapy. This retrospective, multicenter study included 120 patients diagnosed with stage IIIB-IIID melanoma receiving both adjuvant and first-line metastatic treatment between 2007 and 2023. Data on clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment regimens and outcomes were collected. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Patients treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib as adjuvant therapy had the longest relapse-free survival (RFS) (median: 8.3 months), followed by those treated with interferon (4.1 months) and nivolumab (1.9 months) (p = 0.002). Metastatically, the highest ORR was observed in patients treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib (54.5%), followed by ICI (52.0%) and chemotherapy (33.3%). Similarly, DCR was superior for dabrafenib plus trametinib (86.3%) compared to ICI (70.8%) and chemotherapy (66.6%). Median PFS was 9.7 months (95% CI 7.2-12.2 months) in the whole group. This was 14.3 months (95% CI 9.6-19.0 months) with ICI, 10.3 months (95% CI 4.2-16.4 months) with BRAF/MEK inhibitors and 6.3 months (95% CI 4.7-7.9 months) with chemotherapy, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Dabrafenib plus trametinib showed the longest median OS (53.5 months) in metastatic patients and was significantly better than chemotherapy (33.6 months) (p < 0.001). BRAF V600E mutation, RFS > 6 months, ORR are all independent factors for OS prognosis. In our study, dabrafenib plus trametinib combination was more effective in adjuvant treatment of melanoma, while immunotherapy was more effective in metastatic first-line treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.