Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39863700›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Early identification of dropouts during the special forces selection program.

Ruud J R den Hartigh, Rik Huijzer, Frank J Blaauw, Age de Wit, Peter de Jonge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruud J R den HartighDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712TS, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.r.den.hartigh@rug.nl.
Rik HuijzerDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712TS, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Frank J BlaauwResearch and Innovation, Researchable BV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Age de WitHuman Performance Team Commando Corps, Ministry of Defence, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Peter de JongeDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712TS, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recruits are exposed to high levels of psychological and physical stress during the special forces selection period, resulting in dropout rates of up to 80%. To identify who likely drops out, we assessed a group of 249 recruits, every week of the selection program, on their self-efficacy, motivation, experienced psychological and physical stress, and recovery. Using linear regression as well as state-of-the-art machine learning techniques, we aimed to build a model that could meaningfully predict dropout while remaining interpretable. Furthermore, we inspected the best-performing model to identify the most important predictors of dropout. Via cross-validation, we found that linear regression had a relatively good predictive performance with an Area Under the Curve of 0.69, and provided interpretable insights. Low levels of self-efficacy and motivation were the significant predictors of dropout. Additionally, we found that dropout could often be predicted multiple weeks in advance. These findings offer novel insights in the use of prediction models on psychological and physical processes, specifically in the context of special forces selection. This offers opportunities for early intervention and support, which may ultimately improve success rates of selection programs.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelAdultFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMachine LearningMaleMotivationSelf EfficacyStress, PsychologicalYoung AdultGradient boostingMilitaryPersonnel selectionRecoveryStable and interpretable RUle setsStress

Identifiers

PMID39863700
PMCPMC11762757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.