ArticleScientific reports2025
A vision model for automated frozen tuna processing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multi-Objective Optimization Cutting Method for Irregularly Shaped Fish Fillets.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automation, Robotics, and Artificial Intelligence in Seafood Processing: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Prospects.Journal of food science · 2026Review
- Hand Detection in Hazardous Zones of Frozen Tuna Cutting Machines Based on an Infrared Thermopile Sensor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and rapid segmentation of key parts of frozen tuna, along with precise pose estimation, is crucial for automated processing. However, challenges such as size differences and indistinct features of tuna parts, as well as the complexity of determining fish poses in multi-fish scenarios, hinder this process. To address these issues, this paper introduces TunaVision, a vision model based on YOLOv8 designed for automated tuna processing. TunaVision incorporates enhancements in instance segmentation through YOLOv8m-FusionSeg, improving the segmentation of small and complex targets by increasing channel depth and optimizing feature fusion. Additionally, the YOLOv8s RSF model improves feature extraction speed and accuracy, ensuring each fish is correctly identified and localized before segmentation and pose estimation. Furthermore, TunaVision employs a vector-based approach for pose estimation, utilizing detection and segmentation results to determine fish posture and orientation. Experiments show that YOLOv8m-FusionSeg achieves an mAP@0.5 of 93.3%, while YOLOv8s RSF achieves an mAP@0.5 of 96.1%, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.81 degrees in angle estimation, significantly outperforming other methods. These findings highlight TunaVision's effectiveness in segmenting, detecting, and estimating poses of frozen tuna, offering valuable insights for the development of automated processing systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.