Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39863697›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Human response times are governed by dual anticipatory processes with distinct neural signatures.

Ashwin G Ramayya, Vivek Buch, Andrew Richardson, Timothy Lucas, Joshua I Gold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predictive encoding of auditory sequences in the human prefrontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashwin G RamayyaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. aramayya@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4444-0433
Vivek BuchDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1151-6128
Andrew RichardsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-3867
Timothy LucasNeuroTech Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
Joshua I GoldDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6018-0483

Funding

Training Program in Neuroengineering and MedicineT32NS091006 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Brian Litt · 2015 to 2026
$4.1M
NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS091006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human behavior is strongly influenced by anticipation, but the underlying neural mechanisms are poorly understood. We obtained intracranial electrocephalography (iEEG) measurements in neurosurgical patients as they performed a simple sensory-motor task with variable (short or long) foreperiod delays that affected anticipation of the cue to respond. Participants showed two forms of anticipatory response biases, distinguished by more premature false alarms (FAs) or faster response times (RTs) on long-delay trials. These biases had distinct neural signatures in prestimulus neural activity modulations that were distributed and intermixed across the brain: the FA bias was most evident in preparatory motor activity immediately prior to response-cue presentation, whereas the RT bias was most evident in visuospatial activity at the beginning of the foreperiod. These results suggest that human anticipatory behavior emerges from a combination of motor-preparatory and attention-like modulations of neural activity, implemented by anatomically widespread and intermixed, but functionally identifiable, brain networks.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalBrainReaction TimeAdultAttentionCuesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39863697
PMCPMC11762298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.