ArticleScientific reports2025
Temporal transcriptional profiling of host cells infected by a veterinary alphaherpesvirus using nanopore sequencing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Cross-Species Analysis of Transcriptomic Response to Alpha-Herpesvirus Infection in Human, Bovine and Equine Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In our research, we performed temporal transcriptomic profiling of host cells infected with Equid alphaherpesvirus 1 (EHV-1) by utilizing direct cDNA sequencing based on nanopore MinION technology. The sequencing reads were harnessed for transcript quantification at various time points. Viral infection-induced differential gene expression was identified through the edgeR package. The identified genes were segmented into six groups based on their kinetic characteristics. The initial three clusters encompass immediate-early response genes, typically transcription factors and elements of antiviral signaling pathways. These genes were either upregulated (cluster 1) or downregulated (clusters 2 and 3) during the early infection phase. The remaining three clusters include late response genes. In these categories, it is challenging to determine whether changes in gene expression are directly connected to the viral infection or merely side effects of the infection. A study of gene associations using the STRINGDB software revealed several gene networks that might be directly impacted by the virus. We also explored whether gene co-expression could be a result of their collective regulation by upstream transcription factors using the Gene Regulatory Network database. Finally, our differential transcript usage (DTU) analysis identified a number of genes that exhibited altered proportions of transcript isoforms in comparison to non-infected cells. Thus, our analysis revealed that EHV-1 infection not only alters host gene expression but also leads to differential use of transcript isoforms, particularly splice variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.