ArticleScientific reports2025
Non-native PGPB consortium consisting of Pseudomonas sp. G31 and Azotobacter sp. PBC2 promoted winter wheat growth and slightly altered the native bacterial community.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial Community Expansion and Nutrient Activation Underlie Yield Improvement Following Diazotrophic Inoculant Application in Paddy Soil.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Burkholderia sp. ZF6-mediated mitigation of Cd and Zn stress in contaminated soil: effects on Chinese cabbage growth and rhizosphere microbial communities.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Article
- Article
- Response of triticale and its native rhizobacterial community to inoculation with a consortium of Paenibacillus sp. Z15 and Pseudomonas sp. KR227.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Recovery of organic waste from a wastewater treatment plant, improved with plant growth promoting bacteria: model ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Harnessing synergistic potential of plant growth promoting bacteria to mitigate climate-induced stress in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Wheat native endophytic bacteria isolated from Mediterranean and Atlantic agroecosystems: identification, functional profiling and seedling bioassays.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Chloroflexota in agricultural soils: current knowledge and future research directions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Multiple plant growth-promoting bacteria enhance rice growth in non-grain-converted lands.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Advances and Hotspots in Research on Verrucomicrobiota: Focus on Agroecosystems.Microbial ecology · 2025Review
- Pseudomonas protegens as a biocontrol agent against phytopathogenic fungi - mini review.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Biotechnological Test of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria Strains for Synthesis of Valorized Wastewater as Biofertilizer for Silvicultural Production of Holm Oak (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biotransformation of As, Cr, Hg, and Mn by Pseudomonadota: chances and risks.Biodegradation · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) are considered an effective eco-friendly biostimulator. However, relatively few studies have examined how PGPB affect the native bacterial community of major crops. Thus, this study investigates the impact of a PGPB consortium, comprising Pseudomonas sp. G31 and Azotobacter sp. PBC2 (P1A), on the soil bacterial community of wheat under field conditions. As a result of PGPB application, we observed a significant increase in seed yield, as well as in nitrate content (1st and 3rd time points) and available phosphorus (2nd time point) in the rhizosphere compared to control. For the metataxonomic study, Next-Generation Sequencing was performed using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system. The consortium used did not have a significant impact on the diversity of native soil bacteria and slightly affected the taxonomic composition of bacteria with no significant changes in bacterial dominants at the phylum and genus level. Nevertheless, 3 weeks after application, P1A increased the relative abundance of Nitrospira which could have influenced the increase in nitrates in the rhizosphere, and also decreased Bdellovibrio. The results indicate that the P1A consortium, due to its ability to promote plant growth without detrimental alternations in the bacterial community of the soil, may be a potential candidate for commercialization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.