Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39863676›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Effect of pocket compression device on pocket hematoma after cardiac implantable electronic device implantation.

Narawudt Prasertwitayakij, Jakkapun Yanyongmathe, Natnicha Pongbangli, Teerapat Nantsupawat, Siriluck Gunaparn, Cheeranun Pisespongsa, Chanya Tawaditap, Arintaya Phrommintikul, Wanwarang Wongcharoen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Narawudt PrasertwitayakijDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Jakkapun YanyongmatheDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Natnicha PongbangliDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chiang Rai Prachanukroh Hospital, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Teerapat NantsupawatDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Siriluck GunaparnDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Cheeranun PisespongsaFaculty of Medicine, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chanya TawaditapFaculty of Medicine, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Arintaya PhrommintikulDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Wanwarang WongcharoenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. bwanwarang@yahoo.com.

Funding

Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand 101/2566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pocket hematoma is a common and serious complication following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation, contributing to significant morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a novel pocket compression device in reducing pocket hematoma occurrence. We enrolled 242 patients undergoing CIED implantation, randomly assigning them to receive either the novel compression vest with a pressure cuff or conventional sandbag compression. Pocket hematomas were categorized as grade 1 (mild), grade 2 (moderate), or grade 3 (severe, requiring intervention or prolonged hospitalization). The primary endpoint, incidence of pocket hematoma 24 h post-procedure, did not significantly differ between the two groups (26.7% vs. 19.7%, p = 0.224). Rates of grade 2 hematoma were similarly low and comparable (2.5% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.368), with no grade 3 hematomas observed. Skin reactions and patient comfort were similar between groups. The sole predictor for hematoma occurrence was current oral anticoagulation use. In conclusion, our study found a low incidence of clinically significant pocket hematomas. The novel pocket compression device showed comparable efficacy to conventional methods, suggesting it as a viable alternative for reducing post-procedural complications without additional adverse effects.Trial registration number: The study was registered in the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) at https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/ , with the identification number TCTR20230913005, date of first trial registration 13/09/2023.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableHematomaPacemaker, ArtificialAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCardiac implantable electronic devicesDefibrillatorPacemakerPocket compressionPocket hematoma.

Identifiers

PMID39863676
PMCPMC11762974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.