Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39863409›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2025

How do socioeconomic inequalities and preterm birth interact to modify health and education outcomes? A narrative systematic review.

Philip McHale, Katie Fahy, Andy Pennington, Daniela K Schlüter, Ben Barr, David Taylor-Robinson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philip McHaleDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK p.mchale@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8560-2291
Katie FahyDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Andy PenningtonDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Daniela K SchlüterDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ben BarrDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
David Taylor-RobinsonDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHow are socioeconomic inequalities modified by, or how do they interact with, preterm birth?

designNarrative systematic review of quantitative observational studies of an interaction, or effect modification, between preterm birth and socioeconomic status. DATA SOURCES: Five databases were searched for studies published between January 2000 and June 2020. Title and abstract were reviewed to identify articles for dual screening. All included studies were citation searched. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria were comparison across socioeconomic status and gestational age, interaction between the two, or stratification by either, and health or education as outcome. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data extracted included study design, sample size, outcome, interaction measure, effect and significance. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality and synthesised narratively.

resultsAfter searches, 52 studies were identified for full-text screening and, with supplementary citation searches, we identified 21 included studies. Eighteen studies studied interaction between gestational age or preterm birth, and socioeconomic status. Three groups of outcomes were identified: cognitive, mental health and developmental. Age at outcome measurement was divided into four categories: preschool, primary school (5-11), secondary school (11-18) and post school (18-29). Seven studies found a significant interaction between the effect of preterm birth and socioeconomic status. Six of these interactions demonstrate that the negative influence of low socioeconomic status was stronger for those born preterm (and vice versa) for cognitive and mental health outcomes, all in studies with a sample size of more than 100 000. One study found that negative effects of low socioeconomic status were reduced for those born preterm (and vice versa) for communication delay.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that the impact of low socioeconomic status on cognitive and mental health outcomes is exacerbated by preterm birth. The remaining evidence suggests the effects are not modified; however, this is potentially due to underpowered studies. Public health action is indicated to support babies born preterm, particularly for disadvantaged families, to improve educational attainment and mental health. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020203613.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesMental HealthPremature BirthSocial ClassChildCognitionEducational StatusFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancySocioeconomic FactorsPAEDIATRICSPUBLIC HEALTHSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID39863409
PMCPMC11784320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.