ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2025
Physical compatibility of insulin aspart, lidocaine, alprostadil and vancomycin with individualised two-in-one parenteral nutrition used in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging the Gap in the Clinical Application of Advanced Parenteral Nutrition Formulations: From Efficacy to Real-World Challenges.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCritically ill newborn infants often require simultaneous administration of multiple intravenous (IV) solutions through the same catheter lumen, making compatibility of these solutions crucial in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). This study aimed to investigate the physical compatibility of insulin aspart, lidocaine, alprostadil and vancomycin with individualised two-in-one parenteral nutrition (PN).
methodsThe study was conducted at the hospital pharmacy's drug compounding facility of the University Medical Centre Utrecht. Two PN formulations were prepared with different electrolyte concentrations (PN1 with high electrolytes and PN2 with low electrolytes), each with either 0% or 30% w/v glucose, resulting in four solutions for testing. Each solution was then mixed with the selected IV drugs in a 1:1 ratio. Compatibility was assessed through visible particle testing, pH measurements and subvisible particle testing at multiple time points (T=0, T=1, T=4 hours).
resultsNo visible particles were detected in any combinations. However, insulin and lidocaine combinations exceeded the subvisible particle threshold of 6000 particles ≥10 µm per container volume at T=0 hours, with insulin also exceeding the threshold in a specific PN combination at T=4 hours. pH measurements indicated minimal shifts in the PN solutions, suggesting significant buffering capacity.
conclusionAlprostadil and vancomycin IV solutions are physically compatible with two individualised neonatal PN solutions, with high as well as low glucose concentrations. Combinations of PN with lidocaine or insulin form subvisible particles, which could have clinical implications if administered in large volumes over extended periods of time. In clinical scenarios where there is no other option but to administer lidocaine or insulin through the same catheter lumen as PN using a Y-site connector, the use of an in-line filter is advised. Our study adds important compatibility data that can guide clinical practice in NICU settings. However, the broader application of these results requires careful consideration of the unique characteristics of each neonatal PN solution and drug combination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.