ArticleBMJ military health2026
Epidemiology and impact of travellers' diarrhoea differs during UK military training exercises in Kenya and Oman.
Article in BMJ military health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Syndromic Diagnostics for Travelers' Diarrhea: Near-Patient Field-Expedient Testing in Resource-Limited Settings.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal illnesses are common during military training and operational deployments. We compared the incidence and burden of travellers' diarrhoea (TD) reported by British service personnel (SP) during recent training exercises in Kenya and Oman.
methodsSP completed a validated anonymous questionnaire regarding clinical features of any diarrhoeal illness, associated risk factors and impact on work capability after 6-week training exercises in 2018 in Kenya and 2018-2019 in Oman. Responses were tabulated for descriptive comparisons.
resultsQuestionnaires were received from 388 (32%) SP in Kenya and 627 (52%) in Oman. The cumulative incidence of reported diarrhoea over 6-weeks was 14.2% (95% CI 8.02% to 22.61%) in Kenya compared with 3.9% (95% CI 1.10% to 9.91%) in Oman (OR 3.56, 95% CI 2.18 to 5.8; p<0.0001). Attack rates were 9.45 SP/100 exposure-months in Kenya and 2.66/100 in Oman. The number of workdays lost was greater in Kenya (6.26 per 1000 days) compared with Oman (4.13 per 1000 days) (p<0.01). In Kenya, 52.3% of those experiencing diarrhoea became ill during the first 14 days of deployment, but in Oman, 50% were ill in the last deployment week. The strongest risk factor associated with TD at both locations was contact with a colleague experiencing diarrhoea, followed in Kenya by eating locally sourced food and swimming in local water, which had weaker protective associations in Oman.
conclusionsThe epidemiology, risk factors and burden of TD in Kenya were similar to previous descriptions, where overall incidence continues to decline. Incidence and burden were significantly lower in Oman, where both were much lower than historical descriptions. Peak timing of illness and associated risk factors differed between Kenya and Oman. Continued documentation and review of TD during training exercises at different geographical locations is essential to inform the chain of command about risks to operational effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.