Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39862873›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Neurology2025

Crossing the blood-brain barrier: emerging therapeutic strategies for neurological disease.

Josephine H Pedder, Adam M Sonabend, Michael D Cearns, Benedict D Michael, Rasheed Zakaria, Amy B Heimberger, Michael D Jenkinson, David Dickens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Carboplatin and Fluorescein Brain Retention following Ultrasound-Based Blood-Brain Barrier Opening.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The neuroimmune-glutamate hypothesis of addiction.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Josephine H PedderInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Adam M SonabendDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael D CearnsInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Benedict D MichaelDepartment of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Neurology, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Rasheed ZakariaInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Amy B HeimbergerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael D JenkinsonInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
David DickensInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: david.dickens@liverpool.ac.uk.

Funding

STINGing GBM: A First-in- Man Clinical Trial in Surgical Resectable Recurrent GBMP50CA221747 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Hui Zhang · 2018 to 2026
$21.4M
Leveraging doxorubicin immune-modulation, blood-brain barrier opening, and personalized medicine for effective immunotherapy in glioblastoma. A mechanistic approach and pharmacokinetic trial.U19CA264338 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Adam M Sonabend · 2021 to 2026
$5.8M
Modulation of Microglia and T Cell Interactions in Malignant GliomaR01CA120813 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HEIMBERGER, AMY BETH, RAO, GANESH · 2007 to 2025
$4.7M
Blood-brain barrier disruption with implantable ultrasound to enhance paclitaxel delivery: A Phase 1-2 clinical trial in recurrent glioblastomaR01CA245969 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Adam M Sonabend, Roger Stupp · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
A Phase II Clinical Trial in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients Treated with WP1066 and RadiationR01CA272639 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Amy Beth Heimberger, Priya U. Kumthekar · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Spherical Nucleic Acid nano-architectures as first-in-class cGAS agonists for the immunotherapeutic treatment of Glioblastoma.R01CA275430 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MIRKIN, CHAD A., STEGH, ALEXANDER H. · 2022 to 2025
$2.3M
Mechanism and therapeutic potential of microglia regulation in glioblastomaR01NS124594 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Peiwen Chen · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
MAPK as target of glioma immunoediting by CD8 T-cells, and predictor of response to immunotherapyR01NS110703 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SONABEND, ADAM M · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
Stinging the Glioma Immune LandscapeR01NS120547 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HEIMBERGER, AMY BETH, RAO, ARVIND · 2020 to 2023
$1.1M
National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/X001598/1NCI NIH HHS P50 CA221747NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120813NCI NIH HHS R01 CA245969NCI NIH HHS R01 CA272639NCI NIH HHS R01 CA275430NCI NIH HHS U19 CA264338NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110703NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS120547NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS124594Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier is a physiological barrier that can prevent both small and complex drugs from reaching the brain to exert a pharmacological effect. For treatment of neurological diseases, drug concentrations at the target site are a fundamental parameter for therapeutic effect; thus, the blood-brain barrier is a major obstacle to overcome. Novel strategies have been developed to circumvent the blood-brain barrier, including CSF delivery, intracranial delivery, ultrasound-based methods, membrane transporters, receptor-mediated transcytosis, and nanotherapeutics. These approaches each have their advantages and disadvantages. CSF delivery and intracranial delivery are direct but invasive techniques that have not yet shown efficacy in clinical trials, although development of novel delivery devices might improve these approaches. Ultrasound-based disruption has shown some efficacy in clinical trials, but it can require invasive procedures. Approaches using membrane transporters and receptor-mediated transcytosis are less invasive than are other techniques, but they can have off-target effects. Nanotherapeutics have shown promise, but these strategies are in early stages of development. Advancements in drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier will require appropriately designed and powered clinical studies, with a focus on the timing of treatment, demographic and genetic considerations, head-to-head comparison with other treatment strategies (rather than a placebo), and relevant primary and secondary outcome measures.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierDrug Delivery SystemsNervous System DiseasesAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID39862873
PMCPMC12242972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.