Observational studyLa Radiologia medica2025
Superior performance in classification of breast cancer molecular subtype and histological factors by radiomics based on ultrafast MRI over standard MRI: evidence from a prospective study.
Observational study in La Radiologia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06104189 (Ultrafast MRI Radiomics to Classify Histological Factors and Subtypes of Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ultrafast MRI Radiomics to Classify Histological Factors and Subtypes of Breast Cancer
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-powered radiogenomics: imaging-driven diagnosis and discovery of cancer's molecular and cellular landscape.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Review
- Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Deep Learning-Derived Malignancy Scoring in Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype Assessment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Breast tumor segmentation and morphological feature-based classification in ultrasound using a two-stage U-net and SVM.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the performance of ultrafast MRI with standard MRI in classifying histological factors and subtypes of invasive breast cancer among radiologists with varying experience.
methodsFrom October 2021 to November 2022, this prospective study enrolled 225 participants with 233 breast cancers before treatment (NCT06104189 at clinicaltrials.gov). Tumor segmentation on MRI was performed independently by two readers (R1, dedicated breast radiologist; R2, radiology resident). We extracted 1618 radiomic features and four kinetic features from ultrafast and standard images, respectively. Logistic regression algorithms were adopted for prediction modeling, following feature selection by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The performance of predicting histological factors and subtypes was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). Performance differences between MRI methods and radiologists were assessed using the DeLong test.
resultsUltrafast MRI outperformed standard MRI in predicting HER2 status (AUCs [95% CI] of ultrafast MRI vs standard MRI; 0.87 [0.83-0.91] vs 0.77 [0.64-0.90] for R1 and 0.88 [0.83-0.91] vs 0.77 [0.69-0.84] for R2) (all P < 0.05). Both ultrafast MRI and standard MRI showed comparable performance in predicting hormone receptors. Ultrafast MRI exhibited superior performance to standard MRI in classifying subtypes. The classification of the luminal subtype for both readers, the HER2-overexpressed subtype for R2, and the triple-negative subtype for R1 was significantly better with ultrafast MRI (P < 0.05).
conclusionUltrafast MRI-based radiomics holds promise as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for classifying hormone receptors, HER2 status, and molecular subtypes compared to standard MRI, regardless of radiologist experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.