Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39862364›Full record

Observational studyLa Radiologia medica2025

Superior performance in classification of breast cancer molecular subtype and histological factors by radiomics based on ultrafast MRI over standard MRI: evidence from a prospective study.

Juhyun Jeong, Sungwon Ham, Bo Kyoung Seo, Jeong Taek Lee, Shuncong Wang, Min Sun Bae, Kyu Ran Cho, Ok Hee Woo, Sung Eun Song, Hangseok Choi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in La Radiologia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06104189 (Ultrafast MRI Radiomics to Classify Histological Factors and Subtypes of Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06104189 completednot on this map

Ultrafast MRI Radiomics to Classify Histological Factors and Subtypes of Breast Cancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorKorea University Ansan HospitalRan2021 to 2023Enrolled225ConditionsBreast CancerArmsMRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Juhyun Jeong *Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 123 Jeokgeum-Ro, Danwon-Gu, Ansan City, 15355, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea.
Sungwon Ham *Healthcare Readiness Institute for Unified Korea, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
Bo Kyoung SeoDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 123 Jeokgeum-Ro, Danwon-Gu, Ansan City, 15355, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea. seoboky@korea.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9512-5361
Jeong Taek LeeDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 123 Jeokgeum-Ro, Danwon-Gu, Ansan City, 15355, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea.
Shuncong WangDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Min Sun BaeDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 123 Jeokgeum-Ro, Danwon-Gu, Ansan City, 15355, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea.
Kyu Ran ChoDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ok Hee WooDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Eun SongDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hangseok ChoiMedical Science Research Center, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Korea government NRF-2021R1A2C1010565Korea government RS-2024-00347290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the performance of ultrafast MRI with standard MRI in classifying histological factors and subtypes of invasive breast cancer among radiologists with varying experience.

methodsFrom October 2021 to November 2022, this prospective study enrolled 225 participants with 233 breast cancers before treatment (NCT06104189 at clinicaltrials.gov). Tumor segmentation on MRI was performed independently by two readers (R1, dedicated breast radiologist; R2, radiology resident). We extracted 1618 radiomic features and four kinetic features from ultrafast and standard images, respectively. Logistic regression algorithms were adopted for prediction modeling, following feature selection by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The performance of predicting histological factors and subtypes was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). Performance differences between MRI methods and radiologists were assessed using the DeLong test.

resultsUltrafast MRI outperformed standard MRI in predicting HER2 status (AUCs [95% CI] of ultrafast MRI vs standard MRI; 0.87 [0.83-0.91] vs 0.77 [0.64-0.90] for R1 and 0.88 [0.83-0.91] vs 0.77 [0.69-0.84] for R2) (all P < 0.05). Both ultrafast MRI and standard MRI showed comparable performance in predicting hormone receptors. Ultrafast MRI exhibited superior performance to standard MRI in classifying subtypes. The classification of the luminal subtype for both readers, the HER2-overexpressed subtype for R2, and the triple-negative subtype for R1 was significantly better with ultrafast MRI (P < 0.05).

conclusionUltrafast MRI-based radiomics holds promise as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for classifying hormone receptors, HER2 status, and molecular subtypes compared to standard MRI, regardless of radiologist experience.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiomicsBreast cancerHistological factorMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomicsSubtype

Identifiers

PMID39862364
PMCPMC11903601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.