ArticleAngiogenesis2025
Anti-angiogenic therapy as potential treatment for adenomyosis.
Article in Angiogenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic insights into inflammatory cytokines in adenomyosis‑induced infertility (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis: An Integrated Review of Cellular Origins, Molecular Mechanisms, and Intersecting Diseases.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Review
- The Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System Attenuates the Expression of Angiopoietin-1, Angiopoietin-2, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Adenomyosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Revealing the unseen: 3D synchrotron X-Ray imaging of uterine vasculature in adenomyosis.Angiogenesis · 2025Article
- Signaling pathways and advances in targeted therapy for adenomyosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Epigenetic Changes in the Mature Uterus Following Neonatal Feeding of Tamoxifen in Female ICR Mice.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adenomyosis is characterized by abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea and subfertility. Increased expression of angiogenesis markers in adenomyosis presents a treatment opportunity and was studied in an adenomyosis mouse model. Mice were administered tamoxifen (1 mg/kg) on neonatal days 2-5. At six weeks of age, mice received oral treatment with axitinib 3 mg/kg ('dose I/AX3', n = 34), axitinib 25 mg/kg ('dose II/AX25' n = 34), or with vehicle-only ('placebo', n = 34). The prevalence and severity of adenomyosis were assessed. An adenomyosis severity index was calculated by multiplying mean grade/mouse by the percentage affected surface area. Angiogenesis-related gene expression was evaluated using real-time quantitative PCR. 101 mice completed adenomyosis induction and could be analyzed. The prevalence of adenomyosis was 30/33 (90.0%) in dose I, 29/34 (85.3%) in dose II, and 30/34 (88.2%) in placebo treated mice (p = 0.78). High grade (2/3) adenomyosis was significantly less prevalent in mice treated with axitinib dose II (n = 19, 55.9%) than in the placebo group (n = 27, 79.4%, p < 0.05). The adenomyosis severity index was reduced by 48% in the axitinib-treated groups (dose I, p < 0.05). The expression of angiogenic growth factors was reduced in the dose I and II axitinib-treated groups compared to the placebo-treated group. Following these promising first results, further research should focus on commonality among different angiostatic drugs, potential side effects, as well as the method and timing of application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.