ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
Synergizing Monte Carlo simulations and experimental insights for efficient cationic dye removal using natural fluorapatite.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextNatural fluorapatite (FAP) has been investigated as an adsorbent for the removal of dyes such as methylene blue (MB) and crystal violet (CV) from aqueous solutions. Effective dye removal is crucial for water treatment, particularly for industrial wastewater containing toxic dyes. FAP, a naturally abundant material, was characterized using XRD, FTIR, and SEM analysis. The maximum adsorption efficiency achieved was 97% (23 mg/g) for CV and 95% (13 mg/g) for MB under optimal conditions within an equilibrium time of 50 min. The adsorption capacity increased with the ionic strength of the dye solution, reaching 35 mg/g for CV and 28 mg/g for MB. The kinetic study showed that the adsorption of CV and MB is well described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model (R
methodsThe effects of various parameters, including dye concentration, temperature, adsorbent mass, and pH, on the adsorption capacity of FAP were studied. Experimental conditions included an initial dye concentration of 20 mg/L, adsorbent mass of 1 g/L, pH of 12, and temperature of 298 K. The Freundlich model was used to describe the adsorption process, while MD simulations provided insights into the adsorption mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39862319What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.