ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
What does the patients' perception of alignment tell us about alignment targets in total knee arthroplasty?
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKnee alignment significantly impacts the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Understanding patient perceptions of their knee alignment in relation to objective measurements is essential to ensure optimal surgical outcomes and to meet patients' expectations. This study reports patients' perception of pre- and postoperative knee alignment in relation to radiographic alignment measurements. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study included 141 patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee (mean age: 65.4 years, BMI: 30.8). Patients categorized their knee alignment before and after surgery using a picture-based rating scale: very bow-legged (> 10° varus), bow-legged (2.1-10° varus), straight (2° varus to 2° valgus), knock-kneed (2.1-10° valgus), and very knock-kneed (> 10° valgus). Hip-to-ankle films were performed to compared actual knee alignment with patients' assessments retrospectively.
resultsPreoperatively, 15.1% of patients with severe varus, 55.6% with varus, and 86.7% with neutral alignment perceived their knees as straight. None of the patients with valgus or severe valgus alignment considered their knees as straight. Overall, 40.2% of patients with radiographic varus alignment classified their knees as straight, while nobody with valgus alignment did. Postoperatively patients with preoperative varus considered their knees as straight with an average of 1.8 ± 1.7 deg. mechanical varus alignment, while patients with preoperative valgus alignment considered their knees straight with an average of 0.4 ± 0.9 deg. mechanical valgus alignment.
conclusionPatients predominantly desire a straight knee postoperatively, however, most patients tend to perceive some varus alignment as straight. This is most common in patients with up to 5 degrees of varus deformity and suggests that a restricted or inverse kinematic alignment with up to 5 degrees of varus can meet the expectations of most patients. In contrast, patients with valgus deformity are sensitive to any remaining valgus deformity and leaving the knees in more than 2 deg. of valgus will unlikely satisfy the patients' overall desire for a straight knee after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39862299What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.