ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Evaluation value of contrast enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters in ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation-a prospectively study.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contrast-Enhanced Low-Mechanical-Index Endoscopic Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Focal Liver Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo explore the evaluation value of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantitative parameters in ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation to assist its early-diagnosis.
methodsPatients who underwent liver transplantation and intravenous CEUS at Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from June 25, 2020 to December 28, 2022 and were diagnosed with Ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBLs) by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography (PTC) were prospectively enrolled. SonoLiver software was used to quantitatively analyze the contrast images, transplanted livers with normal biliary tracts as the control group. SPSS 25.0 software was used to analyze the data.
resultsThere was a total of 35 patients enrolled in the study, and 15 ITBLs and 30 normal biliary tract of transplanted livers, respectively. The dynamic vascular patterns (DVP) curve of the ITBLs group was negative wave, while the DVP curve of the normal biliary tract group was positive wave. Compared with the patients with normal biliary tract, the Maximum intensity (IMAX), Rise slope 50% (Rs50), Area under curve (AUC), Area under curve in Wash-in phase (WinAUC), Wash in Rate (WinR), Rise slope 10-90% (Rs1090), and Wash out Rate (WouR) of the ITBLs group were lower, while the Fall slope (Fs50) was higher. There was no significant difference in Rise time (RT), Time to Peak (TTP), Fall half time (FHT), Mean transit time (mTT), Fall time (FT), WioAUC ((WioAUC = WinAUC + WouAUC)), and Area under curve in Wash-out phase (WouAUC) between the two groups (P > 0.05). The ROC curve results showed that Fs50 > -2.64 was the cutoff value for predicting ITBLs, with an area under the curve of 0.816 (95%CI: 0.683-0.949), and a sensitivity and specificity of 0.846 and 0.607; Rs50 < 7.08, AUC < 39761.7050, WinR < 101.7 and WouR < 474.52 were the cutoff values for predicting ITBLs, with areas under the curve of 0.853 (95%CI: 0.728-0.979), 0.911 (95%CI: 0.783-1.000), 0.756 (95%CI: 0.615-0.896) and 0.700 (95%CI: 0.536-0.864).
conclusionThe quantitative parameters of CEUS imaging, such as IMAX, Rs50, AUC, WinAUC, WinR, Rs1090, WouR, and Fs50, are helpful in predicting ITBLs and improving the reproducibility of diagnosis. The threshold of these quantitative parameters will aid in the early diagnosis of ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39862289What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.