ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Ability of dynamic chest radiography to identify left ventricular systolic dysfunction in heart failure.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical utility of dynamic chest radiography as an auxiliary tool for atrial fibrillation detection in heart failure: a pilot study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) can estimate haemodynamic parameters in heart failure (HF). However, no studies have evaluated its ability to determine cardiac systolic function in HF. This experimental study investigates the correlation between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) and DCR image parameters in HF. Ninety-one patients with acute HF (median age, 58 years; males, 75%) (cardiologist diagnosis using the Framingham criteria) underwent DCR and transthoracic echocardiography after treatment for the uncompensated phase of HF. The LV apex pixel value (PV) change was measured by DCR. Correlations between the PV change and LVEF, as well as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of DCR, were evaluated. LVEF and LV apex PV change were correlated in all patients (R = 0.428, P < 0.001) and in patients with LVEF < 50% (n = 38; R = 0.355, P = 0.029), < 40% (n = 31; R = 0.343, P = 0.059), and < 30% (n = 23; R = 0.321, P = 0.135). There was no significant correlation for patients with LVEF ≥ 50% (n = 53; R = - 0.004, P = 0.980). The LV apex PV change rate cutoff values for identifying LVEF < 50%, < 40%, and < 30% were 9.3% (AUC: 0.761, sensitivity: 0.698, specificity: 0.789, P < 0.001), 5.5% (AUC: 0.765, sensitivity: 0.883, specificity: 0.645, P < 0.001), and 5.5% (AUC: 0.767, sensitivity: 0.838, specificity: 0.696, P < 0.001), respectively. DCR may be useful to identify LV systolic dysfunction based on LVEF in acute HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.