ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Machine learning-assisted cancer diagnosis in patients with paraneoplastic autoantibodies.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding paraneoplastic neuromyelitis optica: a multi-omics investigation of tumor-driven T and B cell dynamics.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeParaneoplastic syndromes (PNS) are a group of rare disorders triggered by an immune response to malignancy, characterized by diverse neurological, muscular, and systemic symptoms. This study aims to leverage machine learning to develop a predictive model for cancer diagnosis in patients with paraneoplastic autoantibodies.
methodsDemographic data included age and sex, and presenting symptoms were recorded. Laboratory data comprised serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) paraneoplastic autoantibody panels. The study included participants who tested positive for at least one autoantibody. Naive Bayes model was used to predict cancer presence. Model performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, predictive values, AUC-ROC, Brier score, and overall accuracy. Feature importance was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. A graphical user interface (GUI)-based application was developed to facilitate model use.
resultsThe study included 116 participants, with an average age of 57.1 years and a higher proportion of females (53.4%). The most common presenting symptom was ''Motor'' (40.5%), followed by ''Cognitive'' (17.2%) and ''Bulbar'' (15.5%) symptoms. Cancer was present in 23 participants (19.8%). The Naive Bayes model demonstrated high performance with a sensitivity of 85.71% and specificity of 100.00%. The AUC-ROC was 0.9795, indicating excellent diagnostic capability. Age and the presence or absence of specific autoantibodies were significant predictors of cancer.
conclusionMachine learning models, such as the Naive Bayes classifier developed in this study, can accurately stratify cancer risk in patients with positive paraneoplastic autoantibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.