Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39862250›Full record

GuidelineEuropean radiology2025

Abdominopelvic imaging in the follow-up of testicular germ-cell tumors in adults: recommendations of the Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

Pieter De Visschere, Michele Bertolotto, Jane Belfield, Irene Campo, Beniamino Corcioni, Lorenzo Derchi, Vikram Dogra, Caterina Gaudiano, Dean Y Huang, Oliwia Kozak and 14 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Pieter De Visschere *Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. pieter.devisschere@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4842-7877
Michele Bertolotto *Department of Radiology, University of Trieste, Ospedale di Cattinara, Trieste, Italy.
Jane BelfieldDepartment of Radiology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Irene CampoDepartment of Radiology, University of Trieste, Ospedale di Cattinara, Trieste, Italy.
Beniamino CorcioniDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lorenzo DerchiDepartment of Radiology, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Vikram DograDepartment of Radiology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Caterina GaudianoDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Dean Y HuangDepartment of Imaging Sciences, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Oliwia KozakDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Francesco LottiAndrology, Female Endocrinology and Gender Incongruence Unit, University Hospital Careggi (AOUC), Florence, Italy.
Karolina MarkietDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Olivera NikolicCenter for Radiology, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Nicola PavanUrology Clinic, Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Vassiliki PasoglouDepartment of Radiology, Cliniques universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Subramaniyan RamanathanDepartment of Radiology, AI Wakra Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Jonathan RichenbergDepartment of Imaging, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust and Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Laurence RocherService de Radiologie, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, APHP, BIOMAPS. UMR1281. Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Paris, UK.
Camilla SachsRadiological Department, General Hospital Treviso, Treviso, Italy.
Paul S SidhuDepartment of Imaging Sciences, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Katarzyna SkrobiszDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Michal StudniarekDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Athina TsiliDepartment of Clinical Radiology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Mustafa SecilDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group (SPIWG) of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) aimed to formulate recommendations on the imaging modalities and minimal technical requirements for abdominopelvic imaging in the follow-up of adult patients treated for testicular germ-cell tumors (TGCT).

methodsThe SPIWG members performed an extensive literature search, reviewed the current clinical practice, and reached a consensus based on the opinions of experts in the field.

resultsRecurrence in patients treated for TGCT mainly occurs in retroperitoneal lymph nodes (LNs). Abdominopelvic CT and MRI are equivalent assessing retroperitoneal LNs. MRI has the advantage of avoiding radiation exposure, and moreover, diffusion-weighted images (DWI) may increase the detection rates without the need for contrast administration. In patients treated for stage I TGCT, the ESUR-SPIWG recommends MRI over CT for the detection of retroperitoneal LNs during the follow-up after treatment. CT, however, remains the follow-up imaging of choice in patients with advanced disease. When MRI is used, the recommended minimal requirements are at least one high-quality anatomical sequence (T1-WI or T2-WI) in axial and coronal planes, and DWI in the same axial plane, ≤ 4 mm contiguous slices from the diaphragm to the perineum. When CT is used, the recommended minimal requirement is a standard-dose contrast-enhanced CT in the portal-venous phase, scanned from the diaphragm to the perineum.

conclusionsIn this paper, the ESUR-SPIWG provides recommendations on the imaging modalities and minimal technical requirements for abdominopelvic imaging in the follow-up of adult patients treated for TGCT. KEY POINTS: Question There are no recommendations on the preferred imaging modality or scan sequences required for abdominopelvic imaging in the follow-up after treatment for testicular cancers. Findings The European Society of Urogenital Radiology Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group (ESUR-SPIWG) provides recommendations for abdominopelvic imaging in follow-up after treatment for testicular cancers. Clinical relevance Recurrence of testicular germ-cell tumors mainly occurs in retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Both CT and MRI provide similar morphological assessments, but radiation exposure can be avoided by using MRI instead of CT.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalTesticular NeoplasmsAbdomenAdultEuropeFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPelvisPenisScrotumSocieties, MedicalTomography, X-Ray ComputedFollow-upGerm-cell tumorNon-seminomaSeminomaTesticular cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.