ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Enhancing Activation Energy Predictions under Data Constraints Using Graph Neural Networks.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reactive Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials for Chemistry and Materials Science.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Staged Diversity-Constrained Machine Learning for High-Dimensional Reaction Condition Optimization.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Assessing the performance of quantum-mechanical descriptors in physicochemical and biological property prediction.Digital discovery · 2026Article
- Graph-based prediction of reaction barrier heights with on-the-fly prediction of transition states.Digital discovery · 2025Article
- AIQM2: organic reaction simulations beyond DFT.Chemical science · 2025Article
- A Deep Learning-Augmented Density Functional Framework for Reaction Modeling with Chemical Accuracy.JACS Au · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting activation energies is crucial for understanding chemical reactions and modeling complex reaction systems. However, the high computational cost of quantum chemistry methods often limits the feasibility of large-scale studies, leading to a scarcity of high-quality activation energy data. In this work, we explore and compare three innovative approaches (transfer learning, delta learning, and feature engineering) to enhance the accuracy of activation energy predictions using graph neural networks, specifically focusing on methods that incorporate low-cost, low-level computational data. Using the Chemprop model, we systematically evaluated how these methods leverage data from semiempirical quantum mechanics (SQM) calculations to improve predictions. Delta learning, which adjusts low-level SQM activation energies to align with high-level CCSD(T)-F12a targets, emerged as the most effective method, achieving high accuracy with substantially reduced data requirements. Notably, delta learning trained with just 20-30% of high-level data matched or exceeded the performance of other methods trained with full data sets, making it advantageous in data-scarce scenarios. However, its reliance on transition state searches imposes significant computational demands during model application. Transfer learning, which pretrains models on large data sets of low-level data, provided mixed results, particularly when there was a mismatch in the reaction distributions between the training and target data sets. Feature engineering, which involves adding computed molecular properties as input features, showed modest gains, particularly in thermodynamic properties. Our study highlights the trade-offs between accuracy and computational demand in selecting the best approach for enhancing activation energy predictions. These insights provide valuable guidelines for researchers aiming to apply machine learning in chemical reaction engineering, helping to balance accuracy with resource constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.