Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39861984›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation

The Potential of Neonatal Organ Donation in Central Sweden.

Emil Bluhme, Ewa Henckel, Boubou Hallberg, Carl Jorns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emil BluhmeDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0473-2893
Ewa HenckelDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Boubou HallbergDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carl JornsDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7727-8113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric organ transplant recipients have a higher risk for wait list mortality due to the scarcity of size matched organs. Neonatal organ donation could potentially ameliorate the discrepancy but is currently not implemented in Sweden. This study aims to evaluate the potential of neonatal organ donation in central Sweden using a standardized protocol with organ specific criteria. Data on 2,061 neonates who deceased in central Sweden from 2006 to 2016 were collected; 308 neonates met criteria for possible donation. Medical records of all possible donors were reviewed, identifying 85 potential donors. Main cause of death was hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy 47% (n = 40). Median weight was 2,355 (IQR: 1,953) g, with 31% receiving inotropic support. Median creatinine of 72 (IQR: 67) µmol/l, urine production 3 (IQR: 2.2) ml/kg/h, ALT 0.51 (IQR: 1.5) µkat/l, and AST 1.7 (IQR: 3.1) µkat/l. Criteria for kidney donation was met in 39 potential neonatal, 29 for liver and 18 for heart, corresponding to a potential increase of 1.9, 1.4, and 0.9 donors PMP per year, respectively. In total, 16 neonates had a catastrophic neurological injury in combination with lack of brainstem reflexes, indicating plausibility of donation after brain death. Expanding organ donation into the neonatal period in Sweden could lead to an increase in organs available for transplant.

Indexed as

Tissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleSwedenneonateorgan donationtransplantation

Identifiers

PMID39861984
PMCPMC11760126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.