Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39861973›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025

Socio-economic inequalities in second primary cancer incidence: A competing risks analysis of women with breast cancer in England between 2000 and 2018.

Ruchika Golani, Eva Kagenaar, Jérémie Jégu, Aurélien Belot, Suping Ling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of social determinants on the development, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer: recommended public health interventions.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Immigration and Social Factors, Tumor Stage, and Risk of Contralateral Breast Cancer in Asian American and Hispanic Women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruchika GolaniInequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network (ICON) group, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Eva KagenaarInequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network (ICON) group, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jérémie JéguDépartement d'Information Médicale, Groupe Hospitalier Saint Vincent, Strasbourg, France.
Aurélien BelotInequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network (ICON) group, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1410-5172
Suping LingInequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network (ICON) group, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7207-5656

Funding

Cancer Research UK C7923/A29018National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR153580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to investigate socio-economic inequalities in second primary cancer (SPC) incidence among breast cancer survivors. Using Data from cancer registries in England, we included all women diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer (PBC) between 2000 and 2018 and aged between 18 and 99 years and followed them up from 6 months after the PBC diagnosis until a SPC event, death, or right censoring, whichever came first. We used flexible parametric survival models adjusting for age and year of PBC diagnosis, ethnicity, PBC tumour stage, comorbidity, and PBC treatments to model the cause-specific hazards of SPC incidence and death according to income deprivation, and then estimated standardised cumulative incidences of SPC by deprivation, taking death as the competing event. Multiple imputation was performed to account for missing data. Among 649,905 included women, 47,399 SPCs and 171,223 deaths occurred during 4,269,042 person-years of follow-up. Income deprivation was consistently associated with an increased rate of SPC incidence (cause-specific hazard ratio for the most vs. least deprived quintile: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.25, 1.33) and of death (1.36; 1.34, 1.38), translating into an absolute risk difference (the most vs. least deprived quintile) of 1.3% (95% CI: 1.0, 1.5) for SPC incidence and 4.9% (95% CI: 4.6, 5.1) for death at 10 years. Women with PBC from deprived areas in England faced a substantially higher risk of SPC than their counterparts. Future research is warranted to understand mechanisms for observed inequalities to inform strategies to monitor, prevent, and identify SPC in women with PBC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCancer SurvivorsEnglandFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adultbreast cancercompeting risksflexible parametric survival modelsecond primary cancersocio‐economic inequalities

Identifiers

PMID39861973
PMCPMC12008825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.