Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39861972›Full record

Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2025

Probability of achieving bone mineral density treatment goals with denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Felicia Cosman, Zhenxun Wang, Xiaodong Li, Steven R Cummings

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Goal-directed osteoporosis treatment: ASBMR/BHOF task force position statement 2024.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Felicia CosmanDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4554-6616
Zhenxun WangAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA 91230, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1636-7240
Xiaodong LiAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA 91230, United States.
Steven R CummingsSan Francisco Coordinating Center, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute and University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.

Funding

Amgen Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BMD levels achieved on osteoporosis treatment are predictive of subsequent fracture risk, and T-score >-2.5 has been proposed as a minimum treatment target for women with osteoporosis. Knowing the likelihood of attaining target T-scores with different medications for different baseline BMD levels can help determine appropriate initial treatment for individual patients. In this post hoc analysis, we estimated the probability of achieving a non-osteoporotic T-score (>-2.5 or ≥-2.0) at the TH or LS in postmenopausal women >60 yr old treated with denosumab for either 3 or 10 yr in the FREEDOM trial and its long-term extension. In women with baseline TH T-scores of -2.7, -3.0, and -3.5, the probabilities of achieving target T-scores >-2.5 with 3 yr of denosumab were 71%, 12%, and 0.1%, respectively. At LS, for baseline T-scores of -2.7, -3.0, and -3.5, the probabilities were 86%, 59%, and 11%, respectively. Longer treatment duration of up to 10 yr increased the probability of achieving target T-scores. The baseline T-scores that permitted at least 50% of women to achieve a target T-score >-2.5 were -2.8 at TH and -3.1 at LS after 3 yr and -3.0 at TH and -3.7 at LS after 10 yr of treatment. To achieve higher treatment targets (T-scores ≥ -2.0), overall probabilities were lower at both skeletal sites, particularly for TH, even with longer treatment duration. Our results demonstrate that the probability of achieving T-score targets with denosumab is dependent on baseline BMD, skeletal site, and treatment duration. Knowing the probability of achieving treatment targets for different baseline TH and LS T-scores can help determine whether denosumab is an appropriate first choice of treatment in individual patients.

Indexed as

Bone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProbabilityBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabantiresorptiveBMDclinical trialsDXAosteoporosistreatment goals

Identifiers

PMID39861972
PMCPMC12131232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.