Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2025
Probability of achieving bone mineral density treatment goals with denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preventing Hip (Proximal Femoral) Fractures: An Evidence-Based Review for Clinicians.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.Endocrine reviews · 2026Review
- Goal-directed osteoporosis treatment: ASBMR/BHOF task force position statement 2024.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BMD levels achieved on osteoporosis treatment are predictive of subsequent fracture risk, and T-score >-2.5 has been proposed as a minimum treatment target for women with osteoporosis. Knowing the likelihood of attaining target T-scores with different medications for different baseline BMD levels can help determine appropriate initial treatment for individual patients. In this post hoc analysis, we estimated the probability of achieving a non-osteoporotic T-score (>-2.5 or ≥-2.0) at the TH or LS in postmenopausal women >60 yr old treated with denosumab for either 3 or 10 yr in the FREEDOM trial and its long-term extension. In women with baseline TH T-scores of -2.7, -3.0, and -3.5, the probabilities of achieving target T-scores >-2.5 with 3 yr of denosumab were 71%, 12%, and 0.1%, respectively. At LS, for baseline T-scores of -2.7, -3.0, and -3.5, the probabilities were 86%, 59%, and 11%, respectively. Longer treatment duration of up to 10 yr increased the probability of achieving target T-scores. The baseline T-scores that permitted at least 50% of women to achieve a target T-score >-2.5 were -2.8 at TH and -3.1 at LS after 3 yr and -3.0 at TH and -3.7 at LS after 10 yr of treatment. To achieve higher treatment targets (T-scores ≥ -2.0), overall probabilities were lower at both skeletal sites, particularly for TH, even with longer treatment duration. Our results demonstrate that the probability of achieving T-score targets with denosumab is dependent on baseline BMD, skeletal site, and treatment duration. Knowing the probability of achieving treatment targets for different baseline TH and LS T-scores can help determine whether denosumab is an appropriate first choice of treatment in individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.