Observational studyCancer medicine2025
Patterns of Treatment and Real-World Outcomes of Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations Receiving Mobocertinib: The EXTRACT Study.
Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05207423 (Patterns of Care and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Patterns of Care and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increasing incidence and improved survival of leptomeningeal metastasis in advanced lung cancer: a 10-year real-world cohort study.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Cutaneous adverse events associated with Rybrevant based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database from 2021 to 2024.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Characterization of the Population, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes of Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation (EGFRm): A Retrospective Cohort Study from IPO Porto.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReal-world data regarding patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations receiving mobocertinib are limited. This study describes these patients' characteristics and outcomes.
methodsA chart review was conducted across three countries (Canada, France, and Hong Kong), abstracting data from eligible patients (NCT05207423). The inclusion criteria were: ≥ 18 years old; diagnosis of stage IIIB-IV NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins between January 1, 2017 and November 30, 2021; received mobocertinib. Data on demographics, clinical parameters, treatment patterns, mobocertinib exposure, real-world outcomes, and adverse events (AEs) were collected. Results are also reported by Asian/Non-Asian races.
resultsOverall, 105 patients were enrolled (median [IQR] age at initial diagnosis: 64.0 years [56, 71]; women: 62.9%). The most common first-line of therapy (LoT) was chemotherapy; the most common second LoT was EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Most patients received mobocertinib during LoT two and three (74.3%); the maximum dose was 160 mg/day for 67.6% of the cohort (mean [SD] daily dose: 130.6 mg [36.68]). The median real-world progression-free survival (PFS) on mobocertinib was 4.76 months (95% CI: 3.98, 6.21). The overall response rate and disease control rate were 20.0% and 48.6%, respectively (median duration of response: 8.34 months [95% CI: 3.61, 9.49]). The median overall survival (OS) was 26.28 months (95% CI: 20.21, 36.44). Asian patients had numerically superior PFS and OS compared with non-Asian patients. Regarding safety analysis, 73 patients (69.5%) experienced any AE. The most common AE was diarrhea (any grade) (52 patients; 49.5%).
conclusionsThese data illustrate the real-world effectiveness of mobocertinib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.