Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39861939›Full record

ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2025

Evaluating sex and line differences in successive negative contrast and ethanol consumption using alcohol preferring and high alcohol drinking rats.

Nicholle E Smith, Cristine L Czachowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicholle E SmithAddiction Neuroscience, Department of Psychology and Indiana Alcohol Research Center, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4288-0504
Cristine L CzachowskiAddiction Neuroscience, Department of Psychology and Indiana Alcohol Research Center, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Funding

Translational Research and Science Education (OUT)P60AA007611 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI DAVID A. KAREKEN · 2003 to 2026
$45.5M
TRAINING GRANT ON GENETICS ASPECTS OF ALCOHOLISMT32AA007462 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CRISTINE L CZACHOWSKI · 1985 to 2026
$10.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS P60-007611NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA007611NIAAA NIH HHS T32-007462NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe loss of a job or relationship are a couple of examples of unexpected reward loss. Life events, such as these can induce negative emotional reactions (e.g., anxiety and stress), which have been associated with increased alcohol consumption and in turn, an increased risk of developing an alcohol use disorder (AUD). The present study analyzed consummatory successive negative contrast (SNC) for the first time in alcohol preferring (P) and high alcohol drinking (HAD) rats that have been selectively bred to consume high amounts of ethanol. Following reward loss, animals were given free access to ethanol to determine whether consumption would increase as a possible indication of any negative emotional reaction.

methodsMale and female P and HAD rats were split into shifted and unshifted groups receiving either 32% or 4% sucrose for 5 min across 10 preshift days. Subsequently, all animals received 4% sucrose for four postshift days, across which, animals were given access to 20% ethanol for 30 min after access to 4% sucrose.

resultsMale and female P rats demonstrated a longer contrast effect than HAD rats, indicated by a longer recovery time following the downshift in reward. Conversely, HAD males did not demonstrate a contrast effect following this downshift in reward unlike their female counterparts. Surprisingly, P rats who experienced a loss of reward consumed significantly less ethanol than animals who did not. Lastly, individual measure of contrast size, or shift ratio, was significantly associated with greater ethanol consumption in HAD males only, who did not display a contrast effect.

conclusionsThese data indicate different reactivity to SNC between these two lines and sexes, suggesting different genetic and sex-related mechanisms underlying sensitivity to an unexpected loss of reward and ethanol consumption following this loss.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingSex CharacteristicsAnimalsEthanolFemaleMaleRatsRewardSex FactorsEthanolethanolincentive downshiftratsreward downshiftsuccessive negative contrast

Identifiers

PMID39861939
PMCPMC11926666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.