Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39861898›Full record

ArticleViruses2025

Interpretation of COVID-19 Epidemiological Trends in Mexico Through Wastewater Surveillance Using Simple Machine Learning Algorithms for Rapid Decision-Making.

Arnoldo Armenta-Castro, Orlando de la Rosa, Alberto Aguayo-Acosta, Mariel Araceli Oyervides-Muñoz, Antonio Flores-Tlacuahuac, Roberto Parra-Saldívar, Juan Eduardo Sosa-Hernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arnoldo Armenta-CastroSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0006-2347-0963
Orlando de la RosaSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.
Alberto Aguayo-AcostaSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4484-2632
Mariel Araceli Oyervides-MuñozSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3559-2803
Antonio Flores-TlacuahuacSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.
Roberto Parra-SaldívarBiomolecular Innovation Group, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Francisco Villa S/N, Col. Ex Hacienda El Canadá, General Escobedo 66415, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4958-5797
Juan Eduardo Sosa-HernándezSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5441-4768

Funding

Fundación FEMSA NATecnologico de Monterrey Muestreador Pasivo I026 - IAMSM005 - C4-T1 - T
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection and quantification of disease-related biomarkers in wastewater samples, denominated Wastewater-based Surveillance (WBS), has proven a valuable strategy for studying the prevalence of infectious diseases within populations in a time- and resource-efficient manner, as wastewater samples are representative of all cases within the catchment area, whether they are clinically reported or not. However, analysis and interpretation of WBS datasets for decision-making during public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, remains an area of opportunity. In this article, a database obtained from wastewater sampling at wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and university campuses in Monterrey and Mexico City between 2021 and 2022 was used to train simple clustering- and regression-based risk assessment models to allow for informed prevention and control measures in high-affluence facilities, even if working with low-dimensionality datasets and a limited number of observations. When dividing weekly data points based on whether the seven-day average daily new COVID-19 cases were above a certain threshold, the resulting clustering model could differentiate between weeks with surges in clinical reports and periods between them with an 87.9% accuracy rate. Moreover, the clustering model provided satisfactory forecasts one week (80.4% accuracy) and two weeks (81.8%) into the future. However, the prediction of the weekly average of new daily cases was limited (R

Indexed as

COVID-19Machine LearningWastewaterWastewater-Based Epidemiological MonitoringAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisDecision MakingHumansMexicoRisk AssessmentSARS-CoV-2Wastewaterdata-based decision-makingmachine learningSARS-CoV-2wastewater surveillance

Identifiers

PMID39861898
PMCPMC11768489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.