Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39861744›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2025

Optimization of Carrier-Based Dry Powder Inhaler Performance: A Review.

Tanu Mehta, Saeed Najafian, Komalkumar Patel, Justin Lacombe, Bodhisattwa Chaudhuri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tanu MehtaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Saeed NajafianDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-1322-7551
Komalkumar PatelPharmaceutical Development & Engineering Department, Experic, Cranbury, NJ 08512, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8609-4655
Justin LacombePharmaceutical Development & Engineering Department, Experic, Cranbury, NJ 08512, USA.
Bodhisattwa ChaudhuriDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1286-0871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry powder inhalers (DPI's) are becoming increasingly popular due to growing interest in pulmonary drug delivery and their performance is the net result of a series of processes carried out during the formulation development and manufacturing process such as excipient selection, blending, milling, filling, and spray drying. To reach the small airways of the deep lung, the active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) particles need to have an aerodynamic diameter of 1-5 μm to avoid impaction and particle sedimentation in the upper respiratory tract, and due to this small particle size, the powder becomes highly cohesive resulting in poor flow. Therefore, API is usually blended with a coarse carrier to improve flowability, and due to its large size, it is more fluidizable than the micronized drug. Carrier-based DPI formulations usually consist of micronized drugs, a coarse carrier, and additional components, such as micronized lactose and force control agents, including magnesium stearate or leucine. Additionally, the manufacturing process of DPIs relies heavily on powder processing technologies, such as the micronization of API, blending, and powder filling. The aerosol performance of a DPI is significantly affected by the selection of formulation components and the processing of the formulation and, therefore, it is crucial to evaluate these parameters. This review will discuss different factors influencing the aerosol performance of carrier-based DPIs, including formulation components, device considerations, and manufacturing parameters. Additionally, novel technologies pertaining to the optimization of DPI performance are also discussed.

Indexed as

carrierdevice designdry powder inhalerformulation optimizationmanufacturing

Identifiers

PMID39861744
PMCPMC11768101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.