Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39861691›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2024

Safety and Intranasal Retention of a Broad-Spectrum Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibody SA55 Nasal Spray in Healthy Volunteers: A Phase I Clinical Trial.

Chaoying Hu, Yibo Zhou, Xing Meng, Jianhua Li, Jinxia Chen, Zhifang Ying, Xiaoliang Sunney Xie, Yaling Hu, Yunlong Cao, Ronghua Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Current trends in exosomes as therapeutic drug delivery systems.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chaoying HuPhase I Clinical Trial Unit, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China.
Yibo ZhouPhase I Clinical Trial Unit, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China.
Xing MengClinical Research and Development Center, Sinovac Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing 100085, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5309-7681
Jianhua LiZhejiang Key Laboratory of Public Health Detection and Pathogenesis Research, Hangzhou 310051, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9216-4699
Jinxia ChenClinical Research and Development Center, Sinovac Life Sciences Co., Ltd., Beijing 102601, China.
Zhifang YingRespiratory Virus Vaccine, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing 100061, China.
Xiaoliang Sunney XieBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Yaling HuClinical Research and Development Center, Sinovac Life Sciences Co., Ltd., Beijing 102601, China.
Yunlong CaoBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Ronghua JinPhase I Clinical Trial Unit, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100015, China.

Funding

Sinovac Biotech NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA broad-spectrum anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody (mAb), SA55, is highly effective against SARS-CoV-2 variants. This trial aimed at demonstrating the safety, tolerability, local drug retention and neutralizing activity, systemic exposure level, and immunogenicity of the SA55 nasal spray in healthy individuals.

methodsThis phase I, dose-escalation clinical trial combined an open-label design with a randomized, controlled, double-blind design. Healthy participants aged 18-65 years were enrolled and received a single dose of the SA55 nasal spray (1 mg or 2 mg) or multiple doses of SA55 nasal spray/placebo for 7 days (1 or 2 mg/dose, 3 or 6 doses/day). Safety monitoring was conducted throughout the study. Nasal swabs and venous blood samples were collected to analyze local drug concentration/neutralization, systemic exposure, and immunogenicity.

resultsFrom 2 June to 11 August 2023, 80 participants were enrolled and received study intervention. The severity of adverse reactions (ADRs) reported during the study was mild in all cases, and all ADRs were laboratory test abnormalities without corresponding symptoms or vital signs. A total of 9 ADRs were reported, of which all were mild in severity. Overall ADR incidence rate was 16.67% (8/48) in single-dose groups and 4.17% (1/24) in multiple-dose groups. The nasal local drug concentration and neutralizing activity were generally stable within 4-8 h, with favorable neutralization activity against Omicron BF.7 and XBB strains.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability of the SA55 nasal spray in healthy volunteers, exhibited satisfactory neutralizing activity against Omicron variants intranasally, and indicated low systemic toxicity risk.

Indexed as

broad-spectrum neutralizing antibodyintranasal administrationmonoclonal antibodyphase I clinical trialSA55 nasal spraySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39861691
PMCPMC11768346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.