ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Molecular Mechanisms of Grain Chalkiness Variation in Rice Panicles.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic Rewiring of the Shikimate Pathway Enables Rose-Scented Rice.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Ectopic expression of maize gene ZmDUF1645 in rice affects rice grain traits and cold tolerance.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Grain chalkiness adversely affects rice quality, and the positional variation of grain chalkiness within a rice panicle presents a substantial obstacle to quality improvement in China. However, the molecular mechanism underlying this variation is unclear. This study conducted a genetic and physiological analysis of grains situated at distinct positions (upper, middle, and bottom primary branches of the rice panicle, denoted as Y1, Y2, and Y3) within a rice panicle using the Yangdao 6 variety. The results indicated that the percentage of chalky grains (PCG) in Y1 was the highest, i.e., 17.12% and 52.18% higher than that of Y2 and Y3, respectively. Y2 exhibited the highest degree of grain chalkiness (DGC), attributable to its greater area of endosperm chalkiness (AEC) than the others. Y3 demonstrated the lowest PCG and DGC. Additionally, Y1 and Y2 were characterized by lower amylose and protein contents, as well as looser starch granule morphology, in comparison to Y3. Compared with Y3, both the average and maximum filling rates of Y1 and Y2 increased markedly; however, the active filling duration was notably reduced by 7.10 d and 5.56 d, respectively. The analysis of genomic expression levels indicated an enrichment of starch and sucrose metabolism in Y1-vs.-Y2, Y2-vs.-Y3, and Y1-vs.-Y3, with 7 genes (5 up-regulated and 2 down-regulated), 53 genes (12 up-regulated and 41 down-regulated), and 12 genes (2 up-regulated and 10 down-regulated) in the Y1-vs.-Y2, Y2-vs.-Y3, and Y1-vs.-Y3. The majority of these genes were down-regulated, linking metabolic activity to grain filling and contributing to the occurrence of grain chalkiness in rice panicles. In conclusion, the metabolic processes associated with sucrose and starch play a crucial role in regulating grain filling and the formation of chalkiness in rice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.