Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39861545›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agriculture: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Alondra María Díaz-Rodríguez, Fannie Isela Parra Cota, Luis Alberto Cira Chávez, Luis Fernando García Ortega, María Isabel Estrada Alvarado, Gustavo Santoyo, Sergio de Los Santos-Villalobos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The chemical blueprint of Trichoderma for next-generation microbial biostimulants.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. ALife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Effect ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alondra María Díaz-RodríguezLaboratory of Microbial Resource Biotechnology, Department of Agronomic and Veterinary Sciences, Sonora Institute of Technology, 5 de Febrero 818, Centro, Ciudad Obregón 85000, Sonora, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0620-5202
Fannie Isela Parra CotaNorman E. Borlaug-INIFAP Experimental Field, Norman E. Borlaug Km. 12, Ciudad Obregón 85000, Sonora, Mexico.
Luis Alberto Cira ChávezLaboratory of Microbial Resource Biotechnology, Department of Agronomic and Veterinary Sciences, Sonora Institute of Technology, 5 de Febrero 818, Centro, Ciudad Obregón 85000, Sonora, Mexico.
Luis Fernando García OrtegaLaboratory of Learning and Research in Biological Computation, Department of Genetic Engineering, CINVESTAV-IPN, Km 9.6 Libramiento Norte, Irapuato 36824, Guanajuato, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2021-7165
María Isabel Estrada AlvaradoLaboratory of Microbial Resource Biotechnology, Department of Agronomic and Veterinary Sciences, Sonora Institute of Technology, 5 de Febrero 818, Centro, Ciudad Obregón 85000, Sonora, Mexico.
Gustavo SantoyoInstitute of Chemical Biological Research, Michoacan University of San Nicolas de Hidalgo, Morelia 58030, Michoacan, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0374-9661
Sergio de Los Santos-VillalobosLaboratory of Microbial Resource Biotechnology, Department of Agronomic and Veterinary Sciences, Sonora Institute of Technology, 5 de Febrero 818, Centro, Ciudad Obregón 85000, Sonora, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2234-7147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth of the human population has significantly increased the demand for food, leading to the intensification of agricultural practices that negatively impact the environment. Climate change poses a significant threat to global food production, as it can disrupt crop yields and modify the lifecycle stages of phytopathogens and pests. To address these challenges, the use of microbial inoculants, which are bioproducts containing beneficial microorganisms known as plant growth promotion microorganisms (PGPMs), has emerged as an innovative approach in sustainable agriculture. This review covers the isolation and identification of beneficial strains, the screening and selection process, the optimization of production techniques, and the importance of quality control and field testing. It also discusses the key points for the development and formulation of high-quality microbial inoculants, as well as highlights their advancements, current challenges, and future directions for research and application.

Indexed as

bioformulationmicrobial consortiamulti-omicsplant growth promotionsustainability

Identifiers

PMID39861545
PMCPMC11768969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.