ReviewPolymers2025
Cellulose-Based Aerogels for Environmentally Sustainable Applications: A Review of the Production, Modification, and Sorption of Environmental Contaminants.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multifunctional Hydrogels in Sustainable Agriculture: Structure Design, Application and Future Challenges.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Carbon-Cellulose Hybrid Materials for Microplastics Removal: Adsorption Mechanisms, Structure-Function Relationships, and Current Challenges.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Microfluidic Synthesis and Decontamination Evaluation of a Mg/Fe-LDH-Silica Hybrid Composite for Advanced Water Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Review: Sustainable Biosorbent and Biopolymeric Materials for Heavy Metal Adsorption-Advances, Challenges, and Perspectives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nanocellulose-Based Carbon Aerogel Loaded with Composite Metal Oxides and Its Fenton Catalytic Oxidation Degradation of Phenol.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mechanically Strong and Flame-Retardant Cellulose-Based Aerogel Prepared via Phosphorylation-Coupled CaGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in the Utilization of Cellulose from Food Processing Byproducts for the Generation of Aerogels.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Producing Aerogels from Rice Straw Cellulose Obtained by a Green Method and Its Starch Blending.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental pollution, stemming from the disposal of contaminants, poses severe threats to ecosystems and human health. The emergence of a new class of pollutants, termed emerging contaminants (ECs), in soil, water, and air has raised global concerns, aligning with the UN 2030 Agenda's Sustainable Development Goals. Aerogels, three-dimensional structures with high porosity and low density, offer promise in addressing this issue. Cellulose-based aerogels, derived from abundant, renewable, and biodegradable sources, particularly stand out for their potential in adsorption applications. However, challenges arise in water and wastewater treatment due to cellulose aerogel's inherent hydrophilicity. To overcome this limitation, incorporating new components and employing modification processes becomes essential. This article explores the production phases and diverse modifications of cellulose aerogels, aiming to enhance their adsorption capabilities for various environmental contaminants. By addressing hydrophilicity issues and developing stable composites, cellulose aerogels can contribute significantly to efficient and sustainable solutions in the quest for cleaner ecosystems and improved human health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.