Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39861252›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Identification of Lighting Strike Damage and Prediction of Residual Strength of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Laminates Using a Machine Learning Approach.

Rui-Zi Dong, Yin Fan, Jiapeng Bian, Zhili Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rui-Zi DongSchool of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.ORCID 0009-0001-9407-6799
Yin FanSchool of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1728-847X
Jiapeng BianSchool of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Zhili ChenSchool of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.

Funding

COMAC Scientific Week Project COMAC-SFGS-2021-3578National Natural Science Foundation of China 12102255Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 22ZR1429500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the complex and uncertain physics of lightning strike on carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates, conventional numerical simulation methods for assessing the residual strength of lightning-damaged CFRP laminates are highly time-consuming and far from pretty. To overcome these challenges, this study proposes a new prediction method for the residual strength of CFRP laminates based on machine learning. A diverse dataset is acquired and augmented from photographs of lightning strike damage areas, C-scan images, mechanical performance data, layup details, and lightning current parameters. Original lightning strike images, preprocessed with the Sobel operator for edge enhancement, are fed into a UNet neural network using four channels to detect damaged areas. These identified areas, along with lightning parameters and layup details, are inputs for a neural network predicting the damage depth in CFRP laminates. Due to its close relation to residual strength, damage depth is then used to estimate the residual strength of lightning-damaged CFRP laminates. The effectiveness of the current method is confirmed, with the mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) achieving over 93% for damage identification, the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) reducing to 5.4% for damage depth prediction, and the Mean Relative Error (MRE) reducing to 7.6% for residual strength prediction, respectively.

Indexed as

carbon fiber-reinforced polymercompositesidentificationlightning strike damagemachine learningpredictionresidual strength

Identifiers

PMID39861252
PMCPMC11768333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.