Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39861226›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Comparing Hydrolysable and Condensed Tannins for Tannin Protein-Based Foams.

Jonas Eckardt, Lorenzo Moro, Elena Colusso, Primož Šket, Samuele Giovando, Gianluca Tondi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonas EckardtDepartment of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Padua, Italy.
Lorenzo MoroDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 9, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9340-3463
Elena ColussoDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 9, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2914-5962
Primož ŠketSlovenian NMR Centre, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-0508-6010
Samuele GiovandoCentro Ricerche per la Chimica Fine Srl for Silvateam Spa, Via Torre 7, 12080 San Michele Mondovì, Italy.
Gianluca TondiDepartment of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2383-6495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tannin-based foams have gained attention as a potential bio-based alternative to conventional synthetic foams. Traditionally, namely condensed tannins (CT) have been used, leaving the potential of hydrolysable tannins (HT) largely unexplored. This study compared the performance of chestnut (HT) and quebracho (CT) in tannin-protein-based foams at different tannin ratios. Using soy protein isolate (SPI) and hexamine under acidic conditions, a series of tannin foams were produced through a mechanical foaming method and analyzed for cell structure, compression strength, thermal conductivity, and chemical stability. Results show that chestnut tannin is viable in hexamine SPI formulations but is harder to process due to lower reactivity, further resulting in higher material densities compared to quebracho. Foams with higher quebracho content featured smaller, more interconnected cells, while increasing chestnut content led to larger, less interconnected cells. Compression strength decreased with higher chestnut content, while fire resistance and thermal conductivity were influenced by material density rather than tannin type. The

Indexed as

13C NMRbio-basedcastalaginflavonoidhexaminesoy protein isolate

Identifiers

PMID39861226
PMCPMC11768387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.