ArticlePolymers2025
Optimizing Soil Stabilization with Chitosan: Investigating Acid Concentration, Temperature, and Long-Term Strength.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic Structuring and Stabilization of Arid Agro-Soils via a Binary Metacid-Chitosan Interpolymer Complex.Polymers · 2026Article
- Enhancing Tailings Stability with Polymers and Industrial By-Products: An Experimental Study.Polymers · 2026Article
- Nano-priming of lettuce seeds using Chitosan Stabilized iron oxide nanoparticles with tunable interfacial properties.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Polysaccharide-Based Materials: Developments and Properties.Polymers · 2025Article
- Application of Nanocomposites-Based Polymers on Managing Fungal Diseases in Crop Production.The plant pathology journal · 2025Review
- Nano-polymeric curing agents for enhancing water stability in sandy soils: A sustainable approach for ecological slope protection.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Civil and geotechnical researchers are searching for economical alternatives to replace traditional soil stabilizers such as cement, which have negative impacts on the environment. Chitosan biopolymer has shown its capacity to efficiently minimize soil erosion, reduce hydraulic conductivity, and adsorb heavy metals in soil that is contaminated. This research used unconfined compression strength (UCS) to investigate the impact of chitosan content, long-term strength assessment, acid concentration, and temperature on the improvement of soil strength. Static triaxial testing was employed to evaluate the shear strength of the treated soil. Overall, the goal was to identify the optimum values for the mentioned variables so that the highest potential for chitosan-treated soil can be obtained and applied in future research as well as large-scale applications in geotechnical engineering. The UCS results show that chitosan increased soil strength over time and at high temperatures. Depending on the soil type, a curing temperature between 45 to 65 °C can be considered optimal. Chitosan biopolymer is not soluble in water, and an acid solution is needed to dissolve the biopolymer. Different ranges of acid solution were investigated to find the appropriate amount. The strength of the treated soil increased when the acid concentration reached its optimal level, which is 0.5-1%. A detailed chemical model was developed to express how acid concentration and temperature affect the properties of the biopolymer-treated soil. The SEM examination findings demonstrate that chitosan efficiently covered the soil particles and filled the void spaces. The soil was strengthened by the formation of hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions with the soil particles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.