Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39861224›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Optimizing Soil Stabilization with Chitosan: Investigating Acid Concentration, Temperature, and Long-Term Strength.

Runshen Wang, Dominic E L Ong, Hossein Sadighi, Mohammad Goli, Peng Xia, Hadi Fatehi, Tianchi Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Runshen WangKey Laboratory of Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering of Ministry of Education, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China.
Dominic E L OngCities Research Institute, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8604-8176
Hossein SadighiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran.
Mohammad GoliDepartment of Civil, Ocean, Environmental Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-6446-1298
Peng XiaKey Laboratory of Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering of Ministry of Education, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China.
Hadi FatehiCities Research Institute, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia.
Tianchi YaoCollege of Science, Australia National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Civil and geotechnical researchers are searching for economical alternatives to replace traditional soil stabilizers such as cement, which have negative impacts on the environment. Chitosan biopolymer has shown its capacity to efficiently minimize soil erosion, reduce hydraulic conductivity, and adsorb heavy metals in soil that is contaminated. This research used unconfined compression strength (UCS) to investigate the impact of chitosan content, long-term strength assessment, acid concentration, and temperature on the improvement of soil strength. Static triaxial testing was employed to evaluate the shear strength of the treated soil. Overall, the goal was to identify the optimum values for the mentioned variables so that the highest potential for chitosan-treated soil can be obtained and applied in future research as well as large-scale applications in geotechnical engineering. The UCS results show that chitosan increased soil strength over time and at high temperatures. Depending on the soil type, a curing temperature between 45 to 65 °C can be considered optimal. Chitosan biopolymer is not soluble in water, and an acid solution is needed to dissolve the biopolymer. Different ranges of acid solution were investigated to find the appropriate amount. The strength of the treated soil increased when the acid concentration reached its optimal level, which is 0.5-1%. A detailed chemical model was developed to express how acid concentration and temperature affect the properties of the biopolymer-treated soil. The SEM examination findings demonstrate that chitosan efficiently covered the soil particles and filled the void spaces. The soil was strengthened by the formation of hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions with the soil particles.

Indexed as

biopolymerchitosancost-effectiveenvironmentally friendly

Identifiers

PMID39861224
PMCPMC11768198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.