Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39861223›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

The Effectiveness of Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Extraction Methods in Gram-Negative

Luis Getino, Irene García, Alfonso Cornejo, Raúl Mateos, Luisa M Ariza-Carmona, Natalia Sánchez-Castro, José F Moran, Elías R Olivera, Alejandro Chamizo-Ampudia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luis GetinoÁrea de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Departamento de Biología Molecular, Universidad de León, 24007 León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7924-1621
Irene GarcíaIES Los Sauces-Avda Federico Silva, 48, Benavente, 49600 Zamora, Spain.
Alfonso CornejoInstitute for Advanced Materials and Mathematics (INAMAT2), Department of Sciences, Public University of Navarre (UPNA), Campus de Arrosadía, 31006 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8810-0062
Raúl MateosChemical and Environmental Bioprocess Engineering Group, I4 Institute, University of León, 24071 León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2227-6409
Luisa M Ariza-CarmonaFaculty of Education, International University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.
Natalia Sánchez-CastroManchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
José F MoranInstitute for Multidisciplinary Research in Applied Biology (IMAB), Department of Sciences, Public University of Navarre (UPNA), Avda. de Pamplona 123, 31192 Mutilva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6621-6961
Elías R OliveraÁrea de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Departamento de Biología Molecular, Universidad de León, 24007 León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2315-8524
Alejandro Chamizo-AmpudiaÁrea de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Departamento de Biología Molecular, Universidad de León, 24007 León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0563-7954

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioplastics are emerging as a promising solution to reduce pollution caused by petroleum-based plastics. Among them, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) stand out as viable biotechnological alternatives, though their commercialization is limited by expensive downstream processes. Traditional PHA extraction methods often involve toxic solvents and high energy consumption, underscoring the need for more sustainable approaches. This study evaluated physical and chemical methods to extract PHAs from

Indexed as

environmentally friendly solventsextraction processespolyhydroxyalkanoatesPseudomonas putida Upurification

Identifiers

PMID39861223
PMCPMC11769110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.