ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Action Recognition in Basketball with Inertial Measurement Unit-Supported Vest.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Machine Learning for Human Activity Recognition Using Auxetic cTPU Knee-Worn Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Decision-making performance and motor skill consistency in basketball short pass-shot sequences under different levels of mental fatigue: an integrated psychophysiological dynamics analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Enhancing psychological resilience and decision-making in basketball players through emerging technologies.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, an action recognition system was developed to identify fundamental basketball movements using a single Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensor embedded in a wearable vest. This study aims to enhance basketball training by providing a high-performance, low-cost solution that minimizes discomfort for athletes. Data were collected from 21 collegiate basketball players, and movements such as dribbling, passing, shooting, layup, and standing still were recorded. The collected IMU data underwent preprocessing and feature extraction, followed by the application of machine learning algorithms including KNN, decision tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, and XGBoost. Among these, the XGBoost algorithm with a window size of 250 and a 75% overlap yielded the highest accuracy of 96.6%. The system demonstrated superior performance compared to other single-sensor systems, achieving an overall classification accuracy of 96.9%. This research contributes to the field by presenting a new dataset of basketball movements, comparing the effectiveness of various feature extraction and machine learning methods, and offering a scalable, efficient, and accurate action recognition system for basketball.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.