Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39860918›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Is the EnodePro

Nina Behrmann, Martin Hillebrecht, José Afonso, Konstantin Warneke

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nina BehrmannInstitute of Sport Science, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.
Martin HillebrechtUniversity Sport Center, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4258-5580
José AfonsoCentre of Research, Education, Innovation, and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2038-393X
Konstantin WarnekeInstitute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4964-2867

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the EnodePro

methodsThe research question was evaluated by comparing the integrated velocities from the EnodePro

resultsThe results indicated movement specificity, with the ICC values for the squat ranging from 0.204 to 0.991 and with ICC = 0.678-0.991 for the bench press. Systematically higher velocities were reported by the EnodePro DISCUSSION: The EnodePro

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingWeight LiftingAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMuscle StrengthReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult1RMbar velocitybench pressdeep squatEnodePromeasurement errorvalidityvelocity-based training

Identifiers

PMID39860918
PMCPMC11769546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.