Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39860867›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Deep-Learning Method for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Power Machinery via Dual-Attention Mechanism.

Fan Wang, Aihua Liu, Chunyang Qu, Ruolan Xiong, Lu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fan WangSchool of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Energy Power Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Aihua LiuSchool of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Energy Power Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Chunyang QuSchool of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Energy Power Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Ruolan XiongSchool of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Energy Power Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Lu ChenSchool of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Energy Power Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.

Funding

Sanya Science and Education Innovation Park of Wuhan University of Technology 2022KF0019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remaining useful life (RUL) prediction is a cornerstone of Prognostic and Health Management (PHM) for power machinery, playing a crucial role in ensuring the reliability and safety of these critical systems. In recent years, deep learning techniques have shown great promise in RUL prediction, providing more reliable and accurate outcomes. However, existing models often struggle with comprehensive feature extraction, especially in capturing the complex behavior of power machinery, where non-linear degradation patterns arise under varying operational conditions. To tackle this limitation, we propose a multi-feature fusion model leveraging a dual-attention mechanism. Initially, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and channel attention mechanisms are employed to preliminarily extract spatial features. Subsequently, a layer combining a Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU) and self-attention mechanisms is used to further extract and integrate temporal features. Finally, RUL values are predicted via regression. The effectiveness of the proposed method was validated on C-MAPSS datasets, and its superior performance in RUL prediction was demonstrated through comparative analysis with other methods.

Indexed as

dual-attention mechanismGRUmulti-feature fusionpower machineryremaining useful life prediction

Identifiers

PMID39860867
PMCPMC11769517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.