ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Fault Detection in Induction Machines Using Learning Models and Fourier Spectrum Image Analysis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fault Diagnosis Method for Main Pump Motor Shielding Sleeve Based on Attention Mechanism and Multi-Source Data Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sequence-Aware Vision Transformer with Feature Fusion for Fault Diagnosis in Complex Industrial Processes.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Induction motors are essential components in industry due to their efficiency and cost-effectiveness. This study presents an innovative methodology for automatic fault detection by analyzing images generated from the Fourier spectra of current signals using deep learning techniques. A new preprocessing technique incorporating a distinctive background to enhance spectral feature learning is proposed, enabling the detection of four types of faults: healthy motor coupled to a generator with a broken bar (HGB), broken rotor bar (BRB), race bearing fault (RBF), and bearing ball fault (BBF). The dataset was generated from three-phase signals of an induction motor controlled by a Direct Torque Controller under various operating conditions (20-1500 rpm with 0-100% load), resulting in 4251 images. The model, based on a Visual Geometry Group (VGG) architecture with 19 layers, achieved an overall accuracy of 98%, with specific accuracies of 99% for RAF, 100% for BRB, 100% for RBF, and 95% for BBF. A new model interpretability was assessed using explainability techniques, which allowed for the identification of specific learning patterns. This analysis introduces a new approach by demonstrating how different convolutional blocks capture particular features: the first convolutional block captures signal shape, while the second identifies background features. Additionally, distinct convolutional layers were associated with each fault type: layer 9 for RAF, layer 13 for BRB, layer 16 for RBF, and layer 14 for BBF. This methodology offers a scalable solution for predictive maintenance in induction motors, effectively combining signal processing, computer vision, and explainability techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.