Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39860799›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

In Shift and In Variance: Assessing the Robustness of HAR Deep Learning Models Against Variability.

Azhar Ali Khaked, Nobuyuki Oishi, Daniel Roggen, Paula Lago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Azhar Ali KhakedDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-8889-0913
Nobuyuki OishiSchool of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9PS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9809-4011
Daniel RoggenSchool of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9PS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8033-6417
Paula LagoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5290-6486

Funding

Concordia Startup 300010133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL)-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) using wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors can revolutionize continuous health monitoring and early disease prediction. However, most DL HAR models are untested in their robustness to real-world variability, as they are trained on limited lab-controlled data. In this study, we isolated and analyzed the effects of the subject, device, position, and orientation variabilities on DL HAR models using the HARVAR and REALDISP datasets. The Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) was used to quantify shifts in the data distribution caused by these variabilities, and the relationship between the distribution shifts and model performance was drawn. Our HARVAR results show that different types of variability significantly degraded the DL model performance, with an inverse relationship between the data distribution shifts and performance. The compounding effect of multiple variabilities studied using REALDISP further underscores the challenges of generalizing DL HAR models to real-world conditions. Analyzing these impacts highlights the need for more robust models that generalize effectively to real-world settings. The MMD proved valuable for explaining the performance drops, emphasizing its utility in evaluating distribution shifts in HAR data.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHuman ActivitiesHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicWearable Electronic Devicesdata heterogeneitydeep learningdistribution shifthuman activity recognitionmodel robustness evaluationreal world variabilitywearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID39860799
PMCPMC11769501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.