ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An Enhanced Approach Using AGS Network for Skin Cancer Classification.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced skin cancer prediction with medical image data using MobileNetV2 deep learning and optimized techniques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Can deep learning technology really recognize Mpox? A positive response from the EfficientNet model.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin cancer accounts for over 40% of all cancer diagnoses worldwide. However, accurately diagnosing skin cancer remains challenging for dermatologists, as multiple types of skin cancer often appear visually similar. The diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists ranges between 62% and 80%. Although AI models have shown promise in assisting with skin cancer classification in various studies, obtaining the large-scale medical image datasets required for AI model training is not straightforward. To address this limitation, this study proposes the AGS network, designed to overcome the challenges of small datasets and enhance the performance of skin cancer classifiers. The AGS network integrates three key modules: Augmentation (A), GAN (G), and Segmentation (S). It was evaluated using eight deep learning classifiers-GoogLeNet, DenseNet201, ResNet50, MobileNet V3, EfficientNet B0, ViT, EfficientNet V2, and Swin Transformers-on the HAM10000 dataset. Five model configurations were also tested to assess the contribution of each module. The results showed that all eight classifiers demonstrated consistent performance improvements with the AGS network. In particular, EfficientNet V2 + AGS achieved the most significant performance gains over the baseline model, with an increase of +0.1808 in Accuracy and +0.1674 in F1-Score. Among all configurations, ResNet50+AGS achieved the best overall performance, with an Accuracy of 95.87% and an F1-Score of 95.73%. While most previous studies focused on single augmentation methods, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of combining multiple augmentation techniques within an integrated framework. The AGS network demonstrates how integrating diverse methods can improve the performance of skin cancer classification models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.