Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39860738›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Motion Smoothness Analysis of the Gait Cycle, Segmented by Stride and Associated with the Inertial Sensors' Locations.

Leonardo Eliu Anaya-Campos, Luis Pastor Sánchez-Fernández, Ivett Quiñones-Urióstegui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leonardo Eliu Anaya-CamposInstituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City 14389, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3254-4243
Luis Pastor Sánchez-FernándezCentro de Investigación en Computación, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 07738, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5901-4349
Ivett Quiñones-UriósteguiInstituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City 14389, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Portable monitoring devices based on Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) have the potential to serve as quantitative assessments of human movement. This article proposes a new method to identify the optimal placements of the IMUs and quantify the smoothness of the gait. First, it identifies gait events: foot-strike (FS) and foot-off (FO). Second, it segments the signals of linear acceleration and angular velocities obtained from the IMUs at four locations into steps and strides. Finally, it applies three smoothness metrics (SPARC, PM, and LDLJ) to determine the most reliable metric and the best location for the sensor, using data from 20 healthy subjects who walked an average of 25 steps on a flat surface for this study (117 measurements were processed). All events were identified with less than a 2% difference from those obtained with the photogrammetry system. The smoothness metric with the least variance in all measurements was SPARC. For the smoothness metrics with the least variance, we found significant differences between applying the metrics with the complete signal (C) and the signal segmented by strides (S). This method is practical, time-effective, and low-cost in terms of computation. Furthermore, it is shown that analyzing gait signals segmented by strides provides more information about gait progression.

Indexed as

GaitGait AnalysisAccelerationAccelerometryAdultAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFootHumansMaleMotionSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedWalkingYoung Adultgait cyclehuman walkinginertial sensors’ locationsmotor taskrehabilitationsmoothness analysis

Identifiers

PMID39860738
PMCPMC11768905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.