ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Based on the Geometric Characteristics of Binocular Imaging for Yarn Remaining Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Camera Hierarchical Calibration and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Method for Bulk Material Transportation System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Perspective Distortion Correction Method for Planar Imaging Based on Homography Mapping.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The automated detection of yarn margins is crucial for ensuring the continuity and quality of production in textile workshops. Traditional methods rely on workers visually inspecting the yarn margin to determine the timing of replacement; these methods fail to provide real-time data and cannot meet the precise scheduling requirements of modern production. The complex environmental conditions in textile workshops, combined with the cylindrical shape and repetitive textural features of yarn bobbins, limit the application of traditional visual solutions. Therefore, we propose a visual measurement method based on the geometric characteristics of binocular imaging: First, all contours in the image are extracted, and the distance sequence between the contours and the centroid is extracted. This sequence is then matched with a predefined template to identify the contour information of the yarn bobbin. Additionally, four equations for the tangent line from the camera optical center to the edge points of the yarn bobbin contour are established, and the angle bisectors of each pair of tangents are found. By solving the system of equations for these two angle bisectors, their intersection point is determined, giving the radius of the yarn bobbin. This method overcomes the limitations of monocular vision systems, which lack depth information and suffer from size measurement errors due to the insufficient repeat positioning accuracy when patrolling back and forth. Next, to address the self-occlusion issues and matching difficulties during binocular system measurements caused by the yarn bobbin surface's repetitive texture, an imaging model is established based on the yarn bobbin's cylindrical characteristics. This avoids pixel-by-pixel matching in binocular vision and enables the accurate measurement of the remaining yarn margin. The experimental data show that the measurement method exhibits high precision within the recommended working distance range, with an average error of only 0.68 mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.