ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Reliability of a Low-Cost Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) to Measure Punch and Kick Velocity.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical Efficiency and Injury Risk in Leg Kicks Across Combat Sports: A Narrative Review of Stance, Hip Rotation, and Striking Surface Effects.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Use of Technologies for the Acquisition and Processing Strategies for Motion Data Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Limb biomechanics in combat sports: insights from wearable sensor technology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Striking velocity is a key performance indicator in striking-based combat sports, such as boxing, Karate, and Taekwondo. This study aims to develop a low-cost, accelerometer-based system to measure kick and punch velocities in combat athletes. Utilizing a low-cost mobile phone in conjunction with the PhyPhox app, acceleration data was collected and analyzed using a custom algorithm. This involved strike segmentation and numerical integration to determine velocity. The system demonstrated moderate reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 3,1 = 0.746 to 0.786, standard error of measurement (SEM) = 0.488 to 0.921 m/s), comparable to commercially available systems. Biological and technical variations, as well as test standardization issues, were acknowledged as factors influencing reliability. Despite a relatively low sampling frequency, the hardware and software showed potential for reliable measurement. The study highlights the importance of considering within-subject variability, hardware limitations, and the impact of noise in software algorithms. Average strike velocities exhibited higher reliability than peak velocities, making them a practical choice for performance tracking, although they may underestimate true peak performance. Future research should validate the system against gold-standard methods and determine the optimal sampling frequency to enhance measurement accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.