ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025
Evaluation of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Algorithms' Diagnostic Efficacy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet Models.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guideline-based clinical reasoning in periodontology education: a comparative study of residents and large language models.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- From algorithms to empathy: can large language models effectively answer patients' questions in restorative dentistry?BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Performance of 4 artificial intelligence chatbots in responding to multiple choice questions in operative dentistry.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Psychotherapists' Trust, Distrust, and Generative AI Practices in Psychotherapy: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Reliability of Gemini 2.5 Pro, ChatGPT 4.1, DeepSeek V3, and Claude Opus 4 in generating standardized CMR protocols.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Responses from ChatGPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Grok 4, and Claude Sonnet-4 Chatbots to Questions About Endodontic Iatrogenic Events.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Performance of Large Language Models in Recognizing Brain MRI Sequences: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT-4o, Claude 4 Opus, and Gemini 2.5 Pro.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Chatbots in Radiology: Current Applications, Limitations and Future Directions of ChatGPT in Medical Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- AI in Medical Imaging and Image Processing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Impact of Language Variability on Artificial Intelligence Performance in Regenerative Endodontics.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Management of Burns: Multi-Center Assessment Comparing AI Models and Experienced Plastic Surgeons.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of GPT-based differential diagnostic accuracy in radiological cases: 2023-2025.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
- Limitations of broadly trained LLMs in interpreting orthopedic Walch glenoid classifications.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.