ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Diagnostic Algorithm Using Multimodal Imaging for the Differential Diagnosis of Intra-Cardiac Masses.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Overview of Aortic Regurgitation in Young Individuals: Insights From Real-Life Evidence.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- Multimodality Imaging-Guided Valve-Sparing Resection of an Atypical LVOT Blood Cyst in an Adult.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Papillary Fibroelastoma of the Aortic Root Causing Intermittent Coronary Ostial Obstruction: The Diagnostic Power of 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Tricuspid Valve Infective Endocarditis With Biventricular Thrombi: An Unusual Presentation.Case reports in cardiology · 2026Article
- Intracardiac Thrombi in Behçet's Disease: Systematic Review of 218 Patients' Clinical Characteristics and Treatments.European cardiology · 2026Review
- Multimodal echocardiographic techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac tumors: applications and recent advances.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac masses are complex clinical conditions that frequently pose diagnostic challenges in cardiology practice. These masses can form within heart chambers or near the pericardium and are generally categorized as either non-neoplastic or neoplastic. These latter are further classified into benign and malignant (primary and secondary or metastatic). Diagnosing these conditions often requires a multiparametric approach that includes both clinical features, such as the patient's and associated clinical conditions, and multimodality imaging. However, histological examination of the resected specimen is often necessary to ascertain the nature of the mass. Given their heterogeneity and the rarity of many cardiac masses, there are no guidelines or consensus on the best diagnostic approach. Modern imaging protocols must be tailored to the specific clinical issues and patient characteristics, given the rapid advancements in technology. Thus, it is imperative to use a multimodality approach, combining different imaging techniques and multidisciplinary teamwork. Hereby, we propose a practical algorithm for evaluating cardiac lesions using a step-by-step implementation of multimodal imaging. Ultimately, the goal is to tailor the most suitable imaging technique to the patient's needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.