ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Endoscopic-Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Pancreatic Tumors.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation (EUS-RFA): Are We Getting Evidence-Based Results? A Systematic Review According to the Levels of Evidence.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Pancreatic Metastases: Safety and Clinical Outcomes in a Single-Center Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Ultrasound for the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Perspectives.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Advances in radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for large branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: Safety and efficacy trial.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Locoregional Treatments for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a promising minimally invasive technique for the treatment of pancreatic lesions. This review first focuses on the technical aspects in EUS-RFA: the procedure typically employs EUS probes with integrated radiofrequency electrodes, enabling accurate targeting and ablation of pancreatic lesions. Different types of RFA devices, monopolar and bipolar energy delivery systems, are discussed, along with considerations for optimal ablation, including energy settings, procedure time, and pre- and post-procedural management. This paper presents a comprehensive literature review of EUS-RFA applied to both solid and cystic pancreatic lesions, including functioning and non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and pancreatic metastases (PMs), discussing current evidence on safety, efficacy, clinical outcomes, and adverse events (AEs). EUS-RFA is an emerging technique with expanding potential for the treatment of both benign and malignant conditions; however, further studies are needed to better define patient selection criteria, assess long-term benefits, and establish definitive indications for its use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.