ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Strategies for Early Keratoconus Diagnosis: A Narrative Review of Evaluating Affordable and Effective Detection Techniques.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early Detection of Keratoconus: Diagnostic Advances and Their Impact on Visual Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Smartphone-Assisted Placido Ring Imaging for K1 Stratification in Keratoconus: A Deep Learning Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A deep learning approach for keratoconus detection using spatio-temporal features from corneal imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The relationship between correction modality and clinical signs and symptoms of dry eye and meibomian gland dysfunction in keratoconic patients.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Demographic and clinical presentations of keratoconus in Trinidad and Tobago: a retrospective study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning-Based Graphical User Interface for Predicting Corneal Ectasia Scores from Raw Optical Coherence Tomography Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Patients with Keratoconus in an Optometry Clinic in the Palestinian Authority.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- The Future of Interventional Keratoconus Management: Perspectives on Integrating Epithelium-on Oxygen-Enriched Cross-Linking into Comprehensive Care Pathways.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Article
- Comparative Topographic and Tomographic Assessment of Post-LASIK Corneal Ectasia.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Evaluating corneal topographic patterns in keratoconic eyes and their association with keratoconus changes over time.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Interventional Keratoconus Management: The Critical Imperative for Early Detection and Treatment.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Highly efficient stacking ensemble learning model for automated keratoconus screening.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keratoconus is a progressive corneal disorder that can lead to irreversible visual impairment if not detected early. Despite its high prevalence, early diagnosis is often delayed, especially in low-to-middle-income countries due to limited awareness and restricted access to advanced diagnostic tools such as corneal topography, tomography, optical coherence tomography, and corneal biomechanical assessments. These technologies are essential for identifying early-stage keratoconus, yet their high cost limits accessibility in resource-limited settings. While cost and portability are important for accessibility, the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tools must be considered as primary metrics to ensure accurate and effective detection of early keratoconus. This review examines both traditional and advanced diagnostic techniques, including the use of machine learning and artificial intelligence, to enhance early diagnosis. Artificial intelligence-based approaches show significant potential for transforming keratoconus diagnosis by improving the accuracy and sensitivity of early diagnosis, especially when combined with imaging devices. Notable innovations include tools such as SmartKC, a smartphone-based machine-learning application, mobile corneal topography through the null-screen test, and the Smartphone-based Keratograph, providing affordable and portable solutions. Additionally, contrast sensitivity testing demonstrates potential for keratoconus detection, although a precise platform for routine clinical use has yet to be established. The review emphasizes the need for increased awareness among clinicians, particularly in underserved regions, and advocates for the development of accessible, low-cost diagnostic tools. Further research is needed to validate the effectiveness of these emerging technologies in detecting early keratoconus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.