The Intra-Examiner Variability in and Accuracy of Traditional Manual Diagnostics of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Epley maneuver versus 360° maneuver for treatment of posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in a mechanical rotation chair: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2026
   Trial
2. The need for speed: using nystagmus velocity profiles and machine learning models to separate canalithiasis BPV from its mimics.Journal of neurology · 2025
   Article
3. Impact of head orientation and head movement in traditional manual diagnostics of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a randomized controlled crossover study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as