Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39860084›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Deep Learning Approaches for the Prediction of Protein Functional Sites.

Borja Pitarch, Florencio Pazos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Borja PitarchComputational Systems Biology Group, National Center for Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC), 28049 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5220-8810
Florencio PazosComputational Systems Biology Group, National Center for Biotechnology (CNB-CSIC), 28049 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness PID2022-140047OB-C22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowing which residues of a protein are important for its function is of paramount importance for understanding the molecular basis of this function and devising ways of modifying it for medical or biotechnological applications. Due to the difficulty in detecting these residues experimentally, prediction methods are essential to cope with the sequence deluge that is filling databases with uncharacterized protein sequences. Deep learning approaches are especially well suited for this task due to the large amounts of protein sequences for training them, the trivial codification of this sequence data to feed into these systems, and the intrinsic sequential nature of the data that makes them suitable for language models. As a consequence, deep learning-based approaches are being applied to the prediction of different types of functional sites and regions in proteins. This review aims to give an overview of the current landscape of methodologies so that interested users can have an idea of which kind of approaches are available for their proteins of interest. We also try to give an idea of how these systems work, as well as explain their limitations and high dependence on the training set so that users are aware of the quality of expected results.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningProteinsBinding SitesDatabases, ProteinHumansSequence Analysis, ProteinProteinsdeep learningprotein functionprotein functional site

Identifiers

PMID39860084
PMCPMC11767512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.